John Makujina, «The Interpretation of Ps 144,14: Applying a Pluralistic Approach to a Manifold Difficulty», Vol. 92 (2011) 481-502
The interpretation of Ps 144,14 remains unsettled, due primarily to the difficulty of identifying an overall context for the colon. Of the two major positions dominating the debate, one contends that the topic of the entire verse is bovine fecundity, whereas the other considers part of the colon (v. 14b-c) to be about national security. The author finds both views to be problematic and proposes another solution, which retains attractive elements from each position: Ps 144,14 promises the prosperity of livestock, by assuring that they will not become the spoils of war.
Biblica_1_Layout 1 20/01/12 11:44 Pagina 497
497
THE INTERPRETATION OF PS 144,14
Otherwise, it must overcome the less debilitating weaknesses
that challenge other purely pastoral readings of v. 14 as well: the
disputed sense of wnypwla as “our cattleâ€; the difficulties posed by
~ylbsm; and the questionable support for bxr within a rural context.
V. Unity Preserved: Pastoral-Martial Orientation
It is evident then that the last two proposals resolve the tensions
produced by the first two, but at the expense of creating uncertainties
of their own and multiplying the number of problematic options. For-
tunately, a choice between them may, after all, be unnecessary, since
an interpretation that combines the merits of both positions — pas-
toral and martial — is available and will be explored below.
The solution involves maintaining the traditional meaning of
wnypwla (“our cattleâ€) along with the pastoral orientation of the en-
tire verse but also recognizing that it may be enhanced through mar-
tial imagery. The idea is promising when we consider an important
factor that has thus far eluded the discussion: pastoral and military
matters often intersected in the course of ANE history, since live-
stock tended to be among the more coveted spoils of war, or forms
of tribute (Gen 34,28-29; Num 31,9-12.25-47; Deut 2,35; 3,7;
20,14; 28,51; Josh 8,27; 11,14; 1 Sam 14,32; 27,9; 30,20; Jer 5,17;
1 Chr 5,21; 2 Chr 14,13-14) 66. For example, Josh 11,14 reports that
“all the spoil of these cities and the cattle, the children of Israel
plundered for themselvesâ€.
For extra-biblical documentation of this practice it is difficult to
surpass Sennacherib’s famous raid on Judah (701 B.C.), recorded
in the Taylor Prism:
As for Hezekiah, the Judean, I besieged forty-six of his fortified wal-
led cities and surrounding smaller towns, which were without number.
Using packed-down ramps and applying battering rams, infantry at-
tacks by mines, breeches, and siege machines, I conquered (them). I
66
Cfr., R.J. Clifford: “In an agrarian society, political peace and agricul-
tural fertility cannot be separatedâ€. R.J. CLIFFORD, Psalms 73-150 (AOTC;
Nashville, TN 2003) 299.