Juan Carlos Ossandón, «Bartimaeus’ Faith: Plot and Point of View in Mark 10,46-52», Vol. 93 (2012) 377-402
This analysis of the plot and the narrative point of view in Mark 10,46-52 sheds some light on the function of this episode in relation to the characterization of Jesus and of the disciples in Mark. Bartimaeus appears as a model of both confessing Jesus as Messiah and following him on the way to the cross. The narrator describes in detail Bartimaeus’ behavior, but it is Jesus who approves of it and implicitly accepts the blind man’s actions and words as a correct manifestation of faith in him.
04_Biblica_1_A_Ossandon_Layout 1 05/11/12 12:18 Pagina 397
397
BARTIMAEUS’ FAITH
conclude that the episode is meant to make the reader identify with
this character 54. It is true that, through his characterization of Bar-
timaeus, the narrator presents him as a model of faith and of fol-
lowing Jesus, in contrast to the group of the disciples. Bartimaeus
offers an example to be imitated by the disciples and the crowd,
and it should be offered also to the reader, because it was Jesus who
stated it. But to say that Bartimaeus is a model is not the same as
to say that the episode’s goal is to have the reader identify with him.
The text may foster this attitude, but it is difficult to determine pre-
cisely which are the effects of reading. The reader might identify
with Jesus or even with the crowd 55.
2. Verse by Verse Analysis of the Ideological Point of View
a) 10,46
Possible allusions to OT texts could be seen as part of the ideo-
logical point of view. In this case, the city of Jericho, which situates
the episode in the context of the way towards Jerusalem (cf. 10,32),
might recall many passages. But neither this verse, nor the rest of
the episode, seem to allude to any particular text 56.
One can wonder whether the detailed presentation of Bartimaeus
reflects an evaluation by the narrator. In addition to emphasizing
the individuality of the character, giving his proper name and its
translation, maybe suggests a parallel between the son of Timaeus
and the Son of David 57. But I do not think that this can be consid-
ered a valid judgment 58.
54
J.F. WILLIAMS, Other Followers of Jesus. Minor Characters as Major
Figures in Mark’s Gospel (JSNTSup 102; Sheffield 1994) 151-66; FRANCE,
The Gospel of Mark, 422.
55
Curiously enough, DUPONT, “L’aveugleâ€, 365, thinks that the first read-
ers of Mark should identify with those who call Bartimaeus.
56
J. GNILKA, Das Evangelium nach Markus (EKKNT 2; Zürich 1978)
2:108-112 mentions 2 Kgs 7,15 as a parallel of Mark 10,50 and Isa 42,18 as
the background of 10,52. Other OT texts possibly alluded to in Mark 10,46-
52 can be seen in ECKSTEIN, “Markus 10,46-52â€, 41; and J.R. EDWARDS, The
Gospel according to Mark (Grand Rapids, MI 2002) 329. However, the affin-
ity of all these references with Bartimaeus’ episode is weak, and they offer
little help to interpret it.
57
DELORME, “Guérisonâ€, 10.
58
For speculations about the possible meaning of this name, see M.
NAVARRO PUERTO, Marcos (Estella 2006) 382.