Juan Carlos Ossandón, «Bartimaeus’ Faith: Plot and Point of View in Mark 10,46-52», Vol. 93 (2012) 377-402
This analysis of the plot and the narrative point of view in Mark 10,46-52 sheds some light on the function of this episode in relation to the characterization of Jesus and of the disciples in Mark. Bartimaeus appears as a model of both confessing Jesus as Messiah and following him on the way to the cross. The narrator describes in detail Bartimaeus’ behavior, but it is Jesus who approves of it and implicitly accepts the blind man’s actions and words as a correct manifestation of faith in him.
04_Biblica_1_A_Ossandon_Layout 1 05/11/12 12:18 Pagina 387
387
BARTIMAEUS’ FAITH
lack of understanding. John and James seem to have listened only
to Jesus’ words in 8,38‒9,1. They have not heeded the word “crossâ€
and, as well as the other ten, they have not understood the invitation
to service (9,35). Jesus’ answer reflects that he considers God’s
point of view to be above his own 24.
If the section on the way ended in Mark 10,45, one should speak
of the failure of Jesus’ teaching.
III. Plot and Characters in Mark 10,46-52
Several divisions of the Bartimaeus episode have been proposed
based on narrative or structural criteria 25. But every outline shows
some problems. In fact, none of the schemes developed by modern
narratology seem to suit this episode 26.
I would suggest that this difficulty arises because two different
kinds of plot are present in Mark 10,46-52: a “plot of resolutionâ€
and a “plot of revelationâ€. Briefly, when the plot is of resolution,
the pertinent question is: “what is going to happen?†On the con-
trary, if the narration follows a plot of revelation or recognition, the
concatenation of events becomes less relevant with respect to the
details that reflect the protagonist’s personality 27.
These two kinds of plot can be combined within a story. This
possibility helps to understand many Gospel narratives, because
Jesus’ actions not only solve a complication, but also contribute to
manifesting his identity 28.
24
Cf. KINGSBURY, Christology, 49.
25
See H.D. BETZ, “The Early Christian Miracle Story: Some Observations
on the Form Critical Problemâ€, Semeia 11 (1978) 69-81, esp. 72-74; H.-J. ECK-
STEIN, “Markus 10,46-52 als Schlüsseltext des Markusevangeliumsâ€, ZNW 87
(1996) 33-50, esp. 39; SALVATORE, E vedeva, 250-251; A. MPEVO MPOLO,
Genre, sens, position et fonction littéraire des récits marciens de surdi-mutité
et de cécité. Mc 7,31-37; Mc 8,22-26; Mc 9,14-29; Mc 10,46-52: critique de
rédaction et analyse structurelle (EBib Nouvelle Série 54; Paris 2004) 379-386.
26
For an overview of these schemes, see MARGUERAT ‒ BOURQUIN, Pour
lire, 53-67.
27
S. CHATMAN, Story and Discourse. Narrative Structure in Fiction and
Film (Ithaca, NY 1978) 48.
28
J.-N. ALETTI, L’art de raconter Jésus Christ. L’écriture narrative de
l’évangile de Luc (Paris 1989) 59-60 and passim (about Luke’s plot); see also
MARGUERAT ‒ BOURQUIN, Pour lire, 72-74.