Juan Carlos Ossandón, «Bartimaeus’ Faith: Plot and Point of View in Mark 10,46-52», Vol. 93 (2012) 377-402
This analysis of the plot and the narrative point of view in Mark 10,46-52 sheds some light on the function of this episode in relation to the characterization of Jesus and of the disciples in Mark. Bartimaeus appears as a model of both confessing Jesus as Messiah and following him on the way to the cross. The narrator describes in detail Bartimaeus’ behavior, but it is Jesus who approves of it and implicitly accepts the blind man’s actions and words as a correct manifestation of faith in him.
04_Biblica_1_A_Ossandon_Layout 1 13/11/12 11:38 Pagina 388
388 JUAN CARLOS OSSANDÓN
This is why the classical stages of a plot do not fit perfectly the
Gospel narratives. Therefore, it is more practical to start by a divi-
sion of the episode according to its scenes following the model of
Greek tragedy. A change of scene takes place when one or more
characters go out and others come in 29.
According to this criterion, Mark 10,46-52 is easily divided into
four scenes, preceded by a presentation and followed by the de-
scription of the final situation:
1) 10,46, stage setting;
2) 10,47-48, beginning of the action,
tension between Bartimaeus and the crowd;
3) 10,49a, Jesus and the crowd;
4) 10,49b, Bartimaeus and the crowd;
5) 10,50-52a, Bartimaeus and Jesus;
6) 10,52bc, final situation.
Notwithstanding its simplicity, this structure immediately high-
lights two points: the story moves around Jesus and Bartimaeus;
and the last scene must be the most important, because it describes
the final meeting between the main characters 30.
The next step is to exhibit the plot’s development, or rather to
explain how the two plots are combined.
1. Plot of Resolution
At first sight, the narrative appears to be a plot of resolution. Let
us see succinctly its stages.
Mark 10,46 constitutes the presentation. The reader receives in-
formation about the characters and their situation. No plot is gener-
ated, because no “narrative program†― that is, an action which
requires a reaction ― remains pending. The arrival in Jericho does
29
In Greek tragedy, “the most common way to break up an episode into
smaller parts was through exit and entrance of characters, dividing an episode
into what we might call discrete scenesâ€, M.R. HALLERAN, “Episodesâ€, A Com-
panion to Greek Tragedy (ed. J. GREGORY) (Malden 2008) 167-182, here 168.
30
A similar structure is proposed by W. KIRCHSCHLÄGER, “Bartimäus - Para-
digma einer Wundererzählung (Mk 10,46-52 par)â€, The Four Gospels 1992.
FS Frans Neirynck (eds. F. VAN SEGBROECK ‒ C.M. TUCKETT ‒ G. VAN BELLE
‒ J. VERHEYDEN) (BETL 100; Leuven 1992) 1105-1123, here 1109-1110.