Juan Carlos Ossandón, «Bartimaeus’ Faith: Plot and Point of View in Mark 10,46-52», Vol. 93 (2012) 377-402
This analysis of the plot and the narrative point of view in Mark 10,46-52 sheds some light on the function of this episode in relation to the characterization of Jesus and of the disciples in Mark. Bartimaeus appears as a model of both confessing Jesus as Messiah and following him on the way to the cross. The narrator describes in detail Bartimaeus’ behavior, but it is Jesus who approves of it and implicitly accepts the blind man’s actions and words as a correct manifestation of faith in him.
04_Biblica_1_A_Ossandon_Layout 1 05/11/12 12:18 Pagina 378
378 JUAN CARLOS OSSANDÓN
characters 4. According to most narrative critics, there is no relevant
distance between the narrator and the implied author, and between
the narratee and the implied reader/audience in Mark, although these
notions are conceptually different 5.
Among the tools offered by narrative criticism, two will be es-
pecially useful: the distinction between a plot of resolution and a
plot of revelation, and the analysis of the narrative point of view. As
far as I know, no scholar has applied these notions to Bartimaeus’
episode. To be sure, some authors have studied the point of view
throughout Mark, but none of them has paid attention to this episode
in particular 6.
Before applying these concepts to Mark 10,46-52, a brief expla-
nation of the concept “narrative point of view†is needed.
I. Point of View: Some Preliminary Considerations
The concept of “point of viewâ€, also called “narrative perspect-
ive†or “focalizationâ€, has its origin in a spatial and psychological
metaphor. It designates the standpoint of an observer with respect
to what he or she observes, and, consequently, it refers also to how
he or she sees it and to the distance between them. The observer
(or “focusâ€) can be near or far, looking at a wide panoramic or con-
centrating on a detail, remaining motionless or moving, etc.
4
I deal with the narrator as “he†and not “she†only for convention. For
the terminology of narrative criticism, see J.L. SKA, “Our Fathers Have Told
Usâ€. Introduction to the Analysis of Hebrew Narratives (SubBi 13; Roma
1990); D. MARGUERAT ‒ Y. BOURQUIN, Pour lire les récits bibliques. Initiation
à l’analyse narrative (Paris 1998).
5
Malbon (Mark’s Jesus) does see a tension between the narrator and the
implied author in Mark. For the narrator, Jesus is the Messiah (cf. Mark 1,1),
but the position of the author is more complex, since, according to Malbon,
Jesus does not accept this title.
6
N.R. PETERSEN, “Point of View in Mark’s Narrativeâ€, Semeia 12 (1978)
97-121; J. DEWEY, “Point of View and the Disciples in Markâ€, SBL Seminar
Papers (ed. K.H. RICHARDS) (Chico, CA 1982) 97-106; V. BALAGUER, Testi-
monio y tradición en San Marcos. NarratologÃa del segundo evangelio (Pam-
plona 1990); S.H. SMITH, A Lion with Wings. A Narrative-Critical Approach
to Mark’s Gospel (Sheffield 1996) 166-191; B. WITHERINGTON III, The Gospel
of Mark. A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary (Grand Rapids, MI 2001) 59-62.