Jean-Noël Aletti, «Paul’s Exhortations in Gal 5,16-25. From the Apostle’s Techniques to His Theology», Vol. 94 (2013) 395-414
After having shown that Gal 5,13-25 forms a rhetorical and semantic unit, the article examines Gal 5,17, a crux interpretum, and proves that the most plausible reading is this one: 'For the flesh desires against the Spirit — but the Spirit desires against the flesh, for those [powers] fight each other — to prevent you from doing those things you would', and draws its soteriological consequences.
04_Biblica_Aletti_Layout 1 08/07/13 12:56 Pagina 404
404 JEAN-NOËL ALETTI
doing what the Spirit prompts him to do, and reciprocally, the Spirit
prevents the same believer from following the solicitations of the flesh.
Such a situation can be qualified as paralysis; still according to Dunn
(and others with him), it is analogous to what is described in Rom 7,14-
25. This being said, today commentators, on the whole, admit to a dif-
ference between Gal 5,16-25 and Rom 7,7-25, which is not speaking
about the Christian but the man without Christ; they are also convinced
that the context of Gal 5,17, in particular Gal 5,24, is not describing
believers paralyzed by an interior struggle, because if they allow them-
selves to be led by the Spirit, they are not yielding to the desires of the
flesh: “And those who belong to Christ Jesus have crucified the flesh
with its passions and desires†25. Indeed, the passage’s dynamic as-
sumes that believers are able to be led by the Spirit and actually are;
otherwise, the exhortation would no longer make sense: what would
be the good of exhorting believers who were prevented from following
the solicitations of the flesh as well as the promptings of the Spirit?
However, because the immediate context of v. 17 assumes that
the believers are able to escape from the slavery of the flesh and are
able to be guided by the Spirit, exegetes have been compelled to in-
terpret this verse in a different way, as witnessed by the second and
third readings. As seen above, for the second, the struggle between
the flesh and the Spirit has a positive result, namely preventing us
from doing whatever we want, in other words, no matter what, or
even from wanting to satiate all our impulses 26. The struggle between
the flesh and the Spirit permits some options and excludes others. In
short, this struggle prompts the believer to discern between what must
be avoided (what is evil and thus harmful) and what must be pre-
ferred (what is good and thus profitable). If, in this case, the Greek
relative pronoun ἅ is given a distributive meaning (“all those things
thatâ€) or even a universal one (“absolutely all the things thatâ€), it is
nevertheless actually designating the evil orientations or impulses. A
passage from Plato’s Lysis 27, in which some expressions are close to
those of Gal 5,17, seems to favor this interpretation:
Gal 5,24. Translation RSV.
25
In addition to BARCLAY, Obeying the Truth, 113, and the authors cited
26
in J. LAMBRECHT, “The Right Things You Want to Do. A note on Gal 5,17aâ€,
Bib 79 (1998) 515-524, see the commentary of A. VANHOYE, Lettera ai Galati
(Milano 2000) 136.
Lysis, 207e-208a. Cf. RASTOIN, Tarse et Jérusalem, 234-243, in which
27
is found a commentary on the passage and an interesting comparison with
© Gregorian Biblical Press 2013 - Tutti i diritti riservati