Jean-Noël Aletti, «Paul’s Exhortations in Gal 5,16-25. From the Apostle’s Techniques to His Theology», Vol. 94 (2013) 395-414
After having shown that Gal 5,13-25 forms a rhetorical and semantic unit, the article examines Gal 5,17, a crux interpretum, and proves that the most plausible reading is this one: 'For the flesh desires against the Spirit — but the Spirit desires against the flesh, for those [powers] fight each other — to prevent you from doing those things you would', and draws its soteriological consequences.
04_Biblica_Aletti_Layout 1 08/07/13 12:56 Pagina 405 04_B
405
PAUL’S EXHORTATIONS IN GAL 5,16-25
Socrates – (207e) Do you consider that a man is happy when en-
slaved and restricted from doing the things he desires (ποιεῖν
ὧν á¼Ï€Î¹Î¸Ï…µοῖ)?
Lysis - Not I, on my word.
Socrates - Then if your father and mother are fond of you, and de-
sire to see you happy, it is perfectly plain that they are anxious
to secure your happiness.
Lysis - They must be, of course.
Socrates - Hence they allow you to do what you want/like (á¼á¿¶ÏƒÎ¹Î½
ἄÏα σε ἃ βοÏλει ποιεῖν), and never scold you, or hinder
(διακωλÏουσιν) you from doing what you (could possibly) de-
sire (ποιεῖν ὧν ἂν á¼Ï€Î¹Î¸Ï…µῇς)?
Lysis - Yes, they do, Socrates. I assure you: they stop me from
doing a great many things (µάλα γε πολλὰ κωλÏουσιν).
In short, if one compares this passage from Lysis with Gal 5,17,
one could say that in the second reading the parents and the
flesh/Spirit struggle have the same role, that of preventing the chil-
dren/believers from desiring anything whatsoever and thus confus-
ing true liberty with the absence of all constraint. In this case, Paul
could have implicitly continued with the metaphor used in Gala-
tians 4, once again reminding the Christians of Galatia that they
have remained small children in need of a pedagogue who prevents
them from doing all that they would like, from following all their
desires, especially the most foolish and dangerous, in order that
progressively they may experiment with what is true liberty, since,
for the Socrates of Lysis, as for him, such is the role of the peda-
gogue 28. Nevertheless, the comparison remains dubious, because
it is the Spirit, and he alone, who prevents the believers from doing
whatever might come to mind. In other words, more than the re-
ciprocal flesh/Spirit enmity, it is the intervention and kind attention
of the Spirit (and his alone) that prevents the believers from fol-
lowing all their impulses. One may also ask if in Gal 5,17δ, the rel-
ative pronoun has all the extension — and the distributive meaning
— that the second reading gives to it. Indeed, when Paul wants to
give the maximal (or distributive) extension to a relative pronoun,
Gal 4,1-2, because the ideas and words in common with Lysis and Galatians
3‒4 are too numerous to speak of a coincidence.
Lysis 208c and Gal 3,24; 4,1-3.
28
© Gregorian Biblical Press 2013 - Tutti i diritti riservati