D.W. Kim, «Where Does It Fit? The Unknown Parables in the Gospel of Thomas», Vol. 94 (2013) 585-595
This article explores the genesis of some parables in the Gospel of Thomas not found elsewhere. They are not thematically related to each other. Then, how many parables exist in the text? In what way are they different or the same in comparison with the canonical Gospels? These parables in Thomas were not excluded from the concern of the post-1960s scholars, but the literary standard was not unified. The Greek fragments (P. Oxy. 654, 1, and 655) do not offer any crucial source in this case, but the Coptic manuscripts (NHC II, 2. 32-51) evince a new insight that the unknown parable tradition is not intended to show dependency on the canonical tradition; rather they commonly provide key evidence which proves the pre-gnostic Jewish sophia tradition.
07_Biblica_AN_Kim_Layout 1 16/12/13 12:29 Pagina 587
587
WHERE DOES IT FIT?
While the standard of cataloguing the Thomasine parables has been
individually chosen and defined, the approach of Stroker went somewhat
further in dividing the Thomasine parables of Jesus into “known parablesâ€
and “unknown parables†9. Stroker’s way of categorising the parables as
“known parables†or “unknown parables†introduced another view, namely
that the nine sayings (Logia 9, 20, 57, 63, 64, 65, 76, 96 and 107) of Thomas
were already to be found in the synoptic texts, but Logia 8, 21.a, 97, 98 and
107, are anonymous parables. Interest in the parables was at a climax when
Morrice claimed that the fifteen Logia are parables of Jesus, and that Logia
21.a, 97 and 98 among them are “completely new†10. Morrice, arguing for
a non-gnostic view of the Coptic Gos. Thom., contended that the four sayings
(Logia 21b, 64, 96 and 107) are derived from Q, and that Logia 9, 20 and 65
are from the Markan tradition. As a result, Logia 33, 47, 62, and 91 were
not considered as Thomasine parables except by Montefiore, but the five
Logia (8, 57, 65, 96 and 107) have been counted as Thomasine by all
contemporary readers. Among them, sayings such as the parable of “a wise
fisherman†(Logion 8), the parable of the “empty jar†(Logion 97), the
parable of the “assassin†(Logion 98) and the parable of “hidden treasureâ€
(Logion 109), as briefly mentioned by Stroker 11, are the unknown parables
of Jesus. If they are not found in the canonical tradition, where do they stand?
Is it possible to see their literary independence?
I. Logion 8: The Parable of a Wise Fisherman
Firstly, Logion 8 of Thomas is about a wise fisherman who cast his
net into the sea. It seems that the fisherman caught many fish, but he
chooses one fish only. The rest of them were thrown back into the sea.
The major theme of the fisherman’s parable 12 is the final decision the
9
W. D. STROKER, “Extra canonical Parables and the Historical Jesusâ€, Se-
meia 44 (1988) 95-120.
10
With regard to the parables of Thomas, Hedrick agrees with the fifteen
Logia view of Morrice (Hidden Sayings of Jesus, 62 & 70-89), even if he
chooses the scene of “a sprouting seed†(NHC II, 2. 37:15-18) instead of the
scene of the “owner of a house and thief†(NHC II, 2. 37:06–37:15). See C.W.
HEDRICK, “Parables and the Kingdom: The Vision of Jesus in Fiction and Faithâ€,
SBL 1987 Seminar Papers (ed. K.H. RICHARDS) (Atlanta, GA 1987) 380-393.
11
For Logion 21a, see STROKER, “Extra-canonical Parablesâ€, 95-120.
12
“And he said, “The man is like a wise fisherman who cast his net into
the sea and drew it up from the sea full of small fish. Among them the wise
fisherman found a fine large fish. He threw all the small fish back into the
sea and chose the large fish without difficulty. Whoever has ears to hear, let
him hearâ€â€ (NHC II, 2. 33:28–34:03).