A.L.H.M. van Wieringen, «Psalm 65 as Non-Appropriation Theology», Vol. 95 (2014) 179-197
The biblical perspective that a receiver of God's promises is not allowed to claim these promises is called non-appropriation theology. Psalm 65 can be read as an example of this non-appropriation theology. The 'I'- character does not claim the fertile Land but can only speak about the abundance of the harvest of their wheat (v. 10). The heading of Psalm 65, identifying the 'I'-character as David, preserves the non-appropriation theology. This non-appropriation theology is retained in the receptionhistory of Psalm 65, as can be found in the Septuagint and the liturgical use of Psalm 65 in the funeral Mass.
02_VanWieringen_179_197 15/07/14 12:15 Pagina 189
PSALM 65 189
Besides the synonyms xaj / avp for sin and rb[ / rpk for for-
giveness, which are used respectively in 2 Sam 12,13 and Ps 65,4,
the most striking parallel is the direct connection between confes-
sion and forgiveness.
However, there are more connections. In the prophetic texts,
there is a correlation between peace and harvest related to the
proper name David, which can be found in Psalm 65 as well.
In Isa 8,23c – 9,6, a new leader is born to the people. In verse 5,
the newborn child receives special throne names: “Deviser of won-
derfulness, Heroic mighty one, Father of eternity, Ruler of peace”.
Although the word $lm “king” cannot be positively used within
the prophecy of Isaiah in view of the failure of King Ahaz, the text
prevents any misunderstanding that this new son will not live up
to the ideal of King David. The last throne name “Ruler of peace”
is elaborated in verse 6: “there will be no end to the peace con-
nected to the throne of David”. To express this peace, the new birth
is described by using the image of the harvest in verse 2: the people
rejoice as they do at the jubilation concerning the harvest. In the
ancient Near East, harvest failure was caused not only by drought
but also by war. When an army marched through the fields, the
fields would yield no harvest. Harvest, therefore, means peace 20.
This connection between peace and harvest can be found in
Psalm 65 as well. After the nations have been silenced (first main
unit), a fertile land is described (second main unit), which implies
a rich harvest. From the first harvest (barley) to the last harvest
(wheat), the fruits of the land are guaranteed.
In Jer 23,5, this image of harvest and the new David is intensi-
fied 21. The new David himself is represented as a sprout. This word
“sprout” connects Ps 65,11 and Jer 23,5.
20 Cf. SCHROER, “Psalm 65”, 286, who discusses the common agricultural
words in Psalm 65 and Isaiah 55, although without mentioning the proper
name dwd in Isa 55,3.
21 For the meaning of “new”, see A.L.H.M. VAN WIERINGEN, “The Theo-
logoumenon ‘New’: Bridging the Old and the New Testament”, The Scriptures
of Israel in Jewish and Christian Tradition (eds. S. MOYISE – J. VERHEYDEN
– B.J. KOET) (NTS 148; Leiden 2013) 285-301.