Juraj Feník - Róbert Lapko, «Annunciations to Mary in Luke 1–2», Vol. 96 (2015) 498-524
In addition to the scene conventionally known as "the Annunciation" (Luke 1,26-38), three other texts in the infancy narrative qualify to be classed as such. This article proposes an understanding of 2,8-20; 2,22- 35; 2,41-52 as annunciation pericopes by highlighting the fact that other characters, namely, the shepherds, Simeon, and Jesus function as messengers communicating to Mary further information about her son. It identifies the messenger, the act of speaking, the message, and the reference to Jesus' mother in each of the four scenes. Luke's infancy narrative, so the argument runs, contains four annunciation scenes in which a progressive revelation about Jesus addressed to his mother takes place.
02_Feník Lapko_498-524_498-524 10/12/15 10:15 Pagina 514
514 JURAJ FENÍK – RÓBERT LAPKO 514
rael-oriented annunciations are now supplemented by a proclamation
of universal salvation. The plural noun e;qnh appears here for the
first time, precisely in the context of Luke’s highlighting Jesus’ sig-
nificance for a group so designated. Whereas the angel in 2,11 iden-
tified the newborn Jesus as swth,r, Simeon insinuates a significant
variation to the salvation vocabulary in that he sees in Jesus God’s
swth,rion with corollaries not only for Israel but for the Gentiles
as well 29. In Simeon’s mouth the terminology of salvation receives
a peculiar slant — it is for the first time in Luke’s narrative explicitly
applied to the Gentiles 30.
Subsequently the evangelist records the parents’ reaction (h=n [...]
qauma,zontej) to the tidings about the boy (evpi. toi/j laloume,noij
peri. auvtou/). Without featuring an explicit verb of hearing, the sen-
tence in 2,33 singles out Joseph and Mary as listening to the pro-
nouncements, even if the opening remark of the proclamation was
plainly directed to God, and the evangelist did not show the parents
to be the addressees of Simeon’s words. The speech provokes the
reaction of wonder among the parents of the child. The genitival
construction peri. auvtou/ standing for the child and the dative evpi. toi/j
laloume,noij referring to Simeon’s annunciation identify the sig-
nificance of the child — not the man’s sudden appearance or his
biographical characteristics — as the primary and the only stimulus
for the puzzlement of the parents. The rationale for their reaction
must be sought in their hearing the words about the universal
salvific import of the child 31. Having heard about the child from
the mouth of Gabriel and the shepherds, Jesus’ mother is informed
29
H. SCHÜRMANN, Das Lukasevangelium. Erster Teil: Kommentar zu
Kapitel 1,1 ‒ 9,50 (HTKNT III/1; Freiburg 1984) 126, moves in the right di-
rection: “Freilich überragt die Aussage, das Kind werde das Heil für alle Völker
sein, das bisher Gesagte [...]”. See also BROWN, The Birth of the Messiah, 444;
COLERIDGE, The Birth of the Lukan Narrative, 171-172; DILLON, The Hymns
of Saint Luke, 132; MARSHALL, The Gospel of Luke, 121; and others.
30
The reference in 2,14 to the peace that results from the savior’s birth
and is granted avnqrw,poij euvdoki,aj may be understood as the first, inchoative
signal of a larger-than-Israel significance of the savior. See DILLON, The
Hymns of Saint Luke, 110-119.
31
D. RUSAM, Das Alte Testament bei Lukas (BZNW 112; Berlin 2003)
81, puts it aptly when writing that the amazement of the parents “ist innerhalb
der Erzählebene zurückzuführen auf die im Nunc Dimittis des Simeon aus-
gesprochene Einbeziehung der Heiden in die Heilsgeschichte”.