Shawn Zelig Aster, «Israelite Embassies to Assyria in the First Half of the Eighth Century», Vol. 97 (2016) 175-198
This article shows that the kingdom of Israel sent ambassadors on an annual basis to the Assyrian empire during much of the reign of Jeroboam II, and it explores the implications of these contacts for the interpretation of Isaiah 1–39 and Hosea. These diplomatic contacts are based on points Fales has raised regarding nimrud Wine List 4 (ND 6212), whose importance for biblical studies has hitherto not been recognized. The recipients of the wine rations in this list are to be identified as ambassadors of weaker kingdoms, among them Samaria, who visited Assyria to pay tribute.
ISRAeLITe eMBASSIeS To ASSyRIA 191
and ensuring that these territories were governed by individuals loyal
to the empire. Jeroboam’s rule of this territory was similar to allowing
the magnates to control territories, while preserving the overlordship
of the Assyrian king. By means of the tribute remitted by the emis-
saries, and the communication to the emissaries of Assyrian imperial
ideology, Israel’s loyalty to Assyria would have been assured, like
the loyalty of the magnates. The feast whose wine rations are recorded
in nWL 4 grouped together emissaries from conquered kingdoms and
palace officials, the loyalty of whom the king required.
vII. Communicating Assyrian royal ideology to Israel
The evidence from nWL 4 shows, therefore, that the foreigners
listed were almost certainly emissaries of their kingdoms, each of
which appears to have been subservient to Assyria in the early eighth
century. emissaries of the kingdom of Israel visited Assyria perhaps
as early as 791, but certainly by 779. In Assyria, they participated in
the annual visit of the foreign ambassadors, at which they were ex-
posed to the full range of Assyrian claims of empire. During the reign
of Joash or that of Jeroboam, or of both, Israelite emissaries visited
Assyria, were issued wine rations, learned of Assyrian claims of em-
pire, and brought this knowledge home to the Land of Israel.
nWL 4 attests only to a single event of Israelite ambassadors, in a single
year, but it is highly unlikely that this was a one-time occurrence. The am-
bassadors may well have brought a tāmartu, or “seeing” gift, brought as
an expression of political amity, or maddattu, tribute brought by vassals 60.
either way, it is unlikely that Assyria would have acquiesced to a single
unrepeated payment, since, as Siddall demonstrates, no real evidence
exists of Assyrian weakness at the end of Adad-nirari’s rule or in the
period immediately following 61. on the contrary, Siddall argues that the
extension of the Assyrian empire following the accession of Tiglath-
Pileser III in 745 was based on the provincial structure and administrative
system established by Adad-nirari III and his sons and successors 62.
on the different types of gifts offered by foreign states to Assyria, see RAD-
60
neR, “Abgaben an den könig von Assyrien”, 214-215. The imbalance of power
between Israel (strong as it may have been in the days of Jeroboam II) and Assyria
supports the latter possibility.
61
SIDALL, The Reign of Adad-Nirari III, 100-133.
62
“The period from 810-730 was a period of gradual, and at times problematic,
administrative expansion” (SIDALL, The Reign of Adad-Nirari III, 131).