82 Josep Rius-Camps and Jenny Read-Heimerdinger καταντάω is always followed by εἰϛ/ἐπί + accusative and never the dative; 2) Luke is the only evangelist to use the verb καταντάω, and only in Acts (× 9 + × 3 D05), where he always uses εἰϛ + accusative except at 20:15 (ἄντικρυϛ); 3) a similar confusion of pronouns is found in the additional material of Acts 15:34 D05: αὐτούϛ D C 33 | αὐτοῦ 88. 614. 1739 al.; B03 uses adverbial αὐτοῦ at Lk. 9:27 (ὧδε D05); Acts 18:19 (ἐκεῖ D05); 21:4 (D05 lac., apud eos d); 4) the adverb αὐτοῦ here at 11:2 picks up the mention of εἰϛ ῾Ιεροσόλυμα in the first clause of the sentence. Supported by a variety of early versions, D05 expands on Peter’s inner thoughts and plans as he goes from Caesarea to Jerusalem. The language is complex and the relationship between the various propositions is not entirely certain. One way to deal with it is to break it down into chunks that cluster around the finite verbs. The sentence, of which the subject is Peter throughout, has a first main finite verb with a dependent infinitive – ἠθέλησε πορευθῆναι – then continues with a series of two aorist participles – προσφωνήσαϛ, ἐπιστηρίξαϛ – followed by two present participles, the first of which qualifies the means of ἐπιστηρίξαϛ – ποιούμενοϛ – and the second – διδάσκων – standing in a temporal relation to the first; a second finite verb is then reached, with the subject repeated by means of a relative pronoun and the action emphasized with an adverbial καί; this is linked straightforwardly to the concluding verb with a conjunctive καί. The relationships between the various propositions can be expressed in the following diagram: ἠθέλησε πορευθῆναι καὶ προσφωνήσαϛ καὶ ἐπιστηρίξαϛ ποιούμενοϛ, διδάσκων ὃϛ καὶ κατήντησεν καὶ ἀπήγγειλεν Summarizing the sentence by tracking the three finite verbs, the line of thought is: ‘Peter wanted to go to Hierosoluma … he arrived there and announced the grace of God.’ On this analysis, the calling and strengthening of the brethren by teaching them took place in the course of the journey, as they went through the villages on the way to Hierosoluma. The following points are made: 1) Peter spent a considerable time in Caesarea first – διὰ ἱκανοῦ χρόνου, cf. 10:48b; 2) it was his decision to leave – ἠθέλησε; 3) it was to Hierosoluma that he wanted to go, not Ierousalem as in B03; 4) he called the brethren – προσφωνήσαϛ τοὺϛ ἀδελφούϛ, and he made their faith firm – ἐπιστηρίξαϛ; 5) he did