72 Josep Rius-Camps and Jenny Read-Heimerdinger 38 ὡϛ ἔχρισεν αὐτόν B P74 ) DC rell ‖ ὃν ἔχρ. D* d it syM.h.p mae aeth; Cyr Epiph Ambr. B03 takes the statement about God anointing Jesus as the content of what Peter’s audience know (οἴδατε, 10:37), whereas D05 take it as being related back to the mention of Jesus in the previous clause. πνεύματι ἁγίω B P74 ) rell ‖ ἁγίω πνεύματι D d. Luke uses various forms to refer to the Holy Spirit43. B03 reads the form that is something of a stereotyped expression in Luke’s writings, generally used to signal a momentous event, as here. The adjective occurs after the noun when the focus is on the Spirit as such rather than on the holiness. The form attested by D05, in which the adjective is placed before the anarthrous noun, is found nowhere else in Luke’s work. By disrupting the stereotypical formula, the expression draws attention to the Holy Spirit. This can be accounted for by the fact that although Peter is familiar with the Holy Spirit, he is talking to Gentiles who were not familiar in the same way. Once again, the account of D05 presents information from the point of view of the hearer (cf. on 10:37 above, ᾿Ιουδαίαϛ). ὃϛ (διῆλθεν) B P74 ) rell ‖ οὗτοϛ D d it vgCT syM.p sa; Vig. The demonstrative pronoun in D05 corresponds to the relative pronoun (ὅν) introducing the previous clause (see above). Since in place of D05’s relative pronoun B03 read αὐτόν, a relative pronoun can be used here without difficulty. (τοὺϛ) καταδυναστευομένουϛ B P74 ) rell, qui obtenebantur d ‖ -θένταϛ D syM.p; Irlat. B03 views the oppressive action of the devil as being exercised at the time of Jesus’ ministry, whereas D05 views it as an action previously accomplished. 39 (μάρτυρεϛ) πάντων B P74 ) rell ‖ αὐτοῦ D d syM.p aeth | om. 383. 915. 2147. It must be supposed that the reading of ΥΜΕΙΣ in D05 (nos d) at the beginning of the sentence instead of ΗΜΕΙΣ is due to itacism, especially in view of the reading ‘his witnesses’, since Cornelius and his household cannot be thought of as witnesses of Jesus. The various forms of the expression are analysed in detail in Read-Heimerdinger, The 43 Bezan Text, 144–72.