34 Paul Danove matically possible interpretations need not be logical or viable within their local context. The following studies establish the viability of each possible interpretation by comparing its content to independent thema- tic, narrative, and / or grammatical developments within the context and, when indicated, rank the support for viable interpretations in relation to the other viable interpretation[s]. For example, contextual considerations recommend the viability of all three grammatically possible interpreta- tions of Acts 27,44. The first interpretation is contextually viable because the centurion who orchestrated the flight from the ship (27,43) or some unspecified entity may interpreted to contribute to the safe passage of all. The second and third interpretations are viable because all may be interpreted to have contributed to their safe passage onto the land by jumping overboard and swimming (27,43) or by following, while holding on to planks and vessels from the ship (27,44). The context establishes that all three grammatically possible interpretations are equally viable in this context. The three grammatically possible and contextually viable interpreta- tions of the verb in Acts 27,44 present starkly different attributions of agency to the verbal subject and differing perspectives on the events of transference and motion. With the first interpretation (tra. act.), those transferred safely onto the land have no agentive properties; with the second (mot. pass.), all initiate their own motion onto the land; and, with the third (tra. pass.) all initiate and instigate their own transference onto the land. The two interpretations of transference permit the retrieval of the unrealized Source because the conceptualization incorporates the initiation of transference at which The Source and Agent are coincident. The interpretation of passive motion, however, does not permit the retrieval of the unrealized Source because the conceptualization considers only the termination of motion at which the Theme and Goal are coincident. As a result, this interpretation places exclusive emphasis on the Goal without reference to the point of departure. 3. The Three-fold Interpretation with Jesus as the Referent of the Verbal Subject In the NT, five verbs in seventeen occurrences admit to interpretation with a passivized active usage of transference / a passive usage of motion / a passive reflexive usage of transference with Jesus as the referent of the subject: παραδίδωμι (be handed over / come over / hand oneself over, Matt 17,22; 20,18; 26,2.45; Mark 9,31; 10,33a; 14,41; Luke 9,44; 18,32; 24,7; Rom 4,25); προσφέρω (be offered / come / offer oneself, Heb 9,28); ἀναλαμβάνω (be taken up / ascend / take oneself up, Mark 16,19; Acts