Philippe Guillaume - Michael Schunck, «Job’s Intercession: Antidote to Divine Folly», Vol. 88 (2007) 457-472
This paper pinpoints how divine folly and human intercession mentioned in Job 42,8 are key concepts to unravel the meaning of the Book of Job. The Epilogue does not restore Job in his former position. Job is not healed but receives a new role as intercessor on behalf of his friends and by extension on behalf of everyone less perfect than he is. Understanding misfortune as the consequence of inescapable bouts of divine folly is the Joban way to account for humanity’s inability to comprehend the divinity.
466 Philippe Guillaume – Michael Schunck
devastating. After letting the satan strike Job twice, God’s wrath is
about to fall upon Eliphaz and his friends and potentially upon us as
well, unless holocausts and Job’s intercession avert the disaster. The
Epilogue is a graduation ceremony of sorts where Job receives the title
of Master in Intercession. As the Job of Ezekiel 14, the Job of the
Prologue saved neither son nor daughter. He was unable to avert the
initial bout of folly because he first had to go through the test. Once an
approved intercessor, Job is qualified to soothe the consequences of
further cases of theopathism by his prayer and, maybe, to prevent
YHWH from acting foolishly too often. Not only Job recovers sons
and daughters, but his intercession becomes efficacious beyond his
own family circle.
Eliphaz is the first sinner for whose restoration Job prays, turning
the table on the one who claimed (in Job 22,27-30) that if only Job
repented, he would pray and YHWH would answer (35). Emphasizing
the efficacy of Job’s prayer for his friends, the book invites its
audience to place itself under the benefit of Job’s intercession against
misfortune. Far from being a hurdle, Job’s continued physical ailment
fosters identification with a suffering humanity. For this reason, Job
keeps a thorn in the flesh (36). His double riches work towards the same
aim, proving that Job is divinely accepted since YHWH compensates
his losses.
The failure to distinguish between retribution and compensation
leads to dismiss the Epilogue as confirmation of the doctrine of
retribution (37) and to miss the importance of compensation as
confirmation of Job’s intercessor status. That God compensates Job’s
loses confirms that Job retains divine favour and is thus able to
intercede for divine clemency on behalf of less righteous people (38).
(35) R. GORDIS, The Book of Job (New York 1978) 494.
(36) F. MIES, L’espérance de Job (Leuven 2006) 434 (2 Cor 12,9).
(37) D.J.A. CLINES, “Why Is there a Book of Job, and What does It Do to You
if You Read It?â€, The Book of Job (ed. W. BEUKEN), 18.
(38) It may be too bold to read here an early form of cult of Saint Job, but
Ezekiel 14 attests the existence of a tradition in which the righteousness of Noah,
Danel and Job granted them a privileged position to deal with divine anger. The
tradition of Job the intercessor continues at the various tombs of Job in Oman,
Palestine (al-Majdal), Syria (NawË, Sheikh Sa’ad) and the Chouf. Although it
does not mention Job, P.W. VAN DER HORST, “The Tombs of the Prophets in Early
Judaismâ€, Japhet in the Tents of Shem (Leuven 2002) 118-119 is highly relevant.
See also J.-L. DÉCLAIS, Les premiers musulmans face à la tradition biblique: trois
récits sur Job (Paris 1996).