Étienne Nodet, «On Jesus' Last Supper», Vol. 91 (2010) 348-369
In the Gospels, Jesus' last supper involves custom and legal issues: chronological discrepancies between the Synoptics and John, a mock trial before the Sanhedrin, two trials before Pilate (John), and so on. This study focuses on the calendar problem, a topic of utmost importance in ancient Judaism, and follows A. Jaubert's hypothesis, against J. Jeremias' now classical view: the Synoptics display a somewhat loose connection with the Jubilees sectarian calendar, while John's chronology seems to be historically more accurate.
363
ON JESUS’ LAST SUPPER
mentioned in Matt 15 is in a longer form: “The days will come,
when the bridegroom is taken away from them, and then they will
fast in those daysâ€; the addition is witnessed by the Western Text
and Luke 5,35. The plural form alludes to Wednesday and Friday.
The parallel passage in Mark 2,20 has a singular “in that dayâ€,
which suggests a reduction of the fasting to Friday only.
Epiphanius of Salamis (315-403), though sometimes confusing,
but often helpful, because of his uncritical way of putting sources
together, gives various traditions. He knows the Didascalia and in
the same way says that Jesus was arrested on the Wednesday and
crucified on the Friday without noticing that this contradicts the
Gospels (Panarion 51:26 ; De fide § 22). In another fragment 34, he
indicates the performance of a customary rite in the Passion week,
on Thursday at the 9th hour 35, “as a memorial of the breaking of
the breadâ€. This could be close to the chronology of the Synoptics,
but he insists that Jesus was not arrested the following night.
At some point the authority of the canonical Gospel elicited
some changes in these traditions. Patriarch Peter of Alexandria
(300-311) speaks of two fasting days, and explains that Wednesday
commemorates the plotting of the Jews with Judas (PG 18.508b).
The Apostolic Constitutions says, too, that the fast on Wednesday
recalls Judas’ betrayal (5:15 and 7:23). In 5:14 the author was
forced to say that Jesus held two suppers: on Tuesday, when he
foretold Judas’ betrayal, and on Thursday, when he ate the
Passover lamb and instituted the Eucharist. Other scraps of
tradition go the same way. The Gospels eventually prevailed, but
earlier traditions can be traced over quite a long period.
From all this material, A. Jaubert concludes that the views of
John and the Synoptics cannot be merged, for they use different
calendars. The former follows the lunar calendar of the Temple,
the “fatherland†of Jesus (John 4,44), the latter the solar calendar.
So the last Passover meal was held on Tuesday evening, uncon-
See K. HOLL, “Ein Bruchstück aus einem bisher unbekannten Brief des
34
Epiphanius â€, Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Kirchengeschichte (Tübingen 1928) II,
204-224. He quotes a work of bishop Victorin (died in 303), which mentions
Jesus’ arrest on the Wednesday.
The earliest official mention of the Maundy Thursday celebration was in
35
the 3rd Council of Carthage (397 CE), see J.D. MANSI, Sacrorum conciliorum
nova et amplissima collectio (Graz 1960) III, 885.