Étienne Nodet, «On Jesus' Last Supper», Vol. 91 (2010) 348-369
In the Gospels, Jesus' last supper involves custom and legal issues: chronological discrepancies between the Synoptics and John, a mock trial before the Sanhedrin, two trials before Pilate (John), and so on. This study focuses on the calendar problem, a topic of utmost importance in ancient Judaism, and follows A. Jaubert's hypothesis, against J. Jeremias' now classical view: the Synoptics display a somewhat loose connection with the Jubilees sectarian calendar, while John's chronology seems to be historically more accurate.
365
ON JESUS’ LAST SUPPER
VI. Traces of the Solar Calendar in the Synoptics
Besides the discrepancy of the Passover date following the
anointing at Bethany, further Synoptic evidence for the Solar
Calendar can be detected.
The most remarkable instance of this is the mention of a solar
eclipse 39 at the 6th hour in Luke 23,45; the parallels speak only of
darkness “over all the earth†(Matt 27,45; Mark 15,33). A solar
eclipse implies it was the day of a new moon, but in the sequel,
after Jesus’ burial, Luke 23,54 has “it was the day of Preparation,
and the Sabbath was dawning†(epeφwsken) 40. This would
ߥ
indicate that the moonrise occurred at the very beginning of the
Sabbath, immediately after sunset, at the time of a full moon, in a
way that exactly matches the Passover day according to the lunar
c a l e n d a r and the Johannine chronology. The Persian sage
Aphrahat, an Assyrian writer of the IV cent., who used only the
lunar calendar, uses a typical phrase when referring to the Exodus
Passover as “the light which enlightens the 15th †(Demonstration
on the Passover, § 6-7). In his view, this is a full moon, which
cannot be reconciled with the darkness of the departure from
Egypt. The undeniable conclusion is that the solar eclipse is a
literary device, which may have been prompted by two somewhat
inter-related considerations: an apocalyptic development of the
lunar eclipse mentioned above (§ 1), and a reminder of the full
moon of the solar calendar, at least for the very first year. Thus,
the eclipse would suggest a transition towards the beginning of a
new Creation, starting with a full moon.
A secondary variant reads eskotisuh o hliov, a harmonization with
39
Matt 24,29.
The plain meaning cannot be “eveningâ€, in spite of a strange Rabbinic
40
statement (m.Pes 1:1) : “At the lighting-up time (rwa): on the 14th of Nisan we
must search for the leaven (≈mj) — by the light (rwa) of a candleâ€. The first part
simply depends on Exod 12,15 “on the first day (= “the 14th of the first monthâ€)
you shall eliminate leaven from your premisesâ€. There the day begins on the
morning (as noted in j.Pes 1:1), but if the lunar calendar is introduced (“Nisanâ€,
a Babylonian name), the 14th has begun in the evening, hence the candles in the
second part. As a result, the first “light†comes to mean “evening†(with a
reference to the light of the stars, Ps 148,3; see b.Pes 2ab ; the full moon is
ignored).