Jerry A. Gladson, «Postmodernism and the Deus absconditus in Lamentations 3», Vol. 91 (2010) 321-334
Lamentations reflects the silence of God. God seemingly does not act or speak. To some, this detachment represents an absence of God; to others, a «hiddenness» of God (Deus absconditus). Analysis of Lam 3,55-57, the crux interpretum for the divine silence, suggests the q strophe may break this oppressive silence. The strophe reflects an awareness of God who speaks. God stands in the background of the whole of life for this poet, emerging only fleetingly and in ways oblique. This perspective is similar to the ambiguous, indeterminate approach to reality in postmodernism. The divine Voice thus joins other voices in Lamentations.
328 JERRY A. GLADSON
If the sequence of verbs alternating between perfects and
imperatives in 3,55-66 be taken in this manner, the movement
toward hope becomes dramatically evident. It concludes with an
imperative for YHWH to bring judgment upon the poet’s enemies, a
specific form of deliverance, as in many lament Psalms.
The entire poem may thus be read as one of falling and rising,
then falling and rising once more to hope. It is thus not entirely a
poem of despair. Like many laments in the Psalms, it alternates
between despair and hope. The poet awaits a divine intervention still
eluding his grasp.
It is possible to read the verbal aspects in 3,55-57 in yet another
manner, as experience (or fientive) perfectives 32.
I call on your name, O YHWH, from the lowest pit.
My voice you hear. You do not cover your ear to my outcry, to my cry.
You approach on a day when I call you. You say, “Do not fearâ€.
Understood in this way, the action in 3,55-57 would be in
process, occurring at the moment or in the immediate present. Such
progressive action is often found with verba dicendi, “verbs of
speaking †33. The poet is now speaking of deliverance somehow
taking place in the present 34. The q strophe thus would be regarded
as an experiencing of the divine relief the poet has so anxiously
awaited in the previous strophes. This strophe heightens intensity up
until the final divine word. “I call on your name, O YHWH†(v. 55),
which is triply emphasized by “my cry you hear, you do not hide
your ear†(v. 56), and “you approach in the day I call you†(v. 57).
The arytAla (v. 57) may be representative of a climatic divine
breaking of silence.
An experience perfective is fientive, often used with imprecations, and
32
expresses a state of mind. This latter category would apply especially to Tbrq,
: ˆ ":
“ you approach,†and Tbrm;,, “you say†in 3,57. See R. WILLIAMS, Williams’
: ˆ ˆ" a
Hebrew Syntax, § 162, 163; GKC § 106abi.
B. WALTKE – M. O’CONNOR, Hebrew Syntax, § 30.5.1d.
33
Comparative evidence from the Psalms (e.g., 17,6; 88,10; 119,145-47;
34
130,1; 141,1) suggests the perfectives in vv. 55-57. be understood as present
action, “I cryâ€, etc. Appeals to YHWH in such poems must sometimes be
translated as present tenses. Cf. B. ALBREKTSON, Studies in the Text and
Theology of the Book of Lamentations with a Critical Edition of the Peshitta
Text (Studia Theologica Lundensia 21; Lund 1963) 163.