Geert Van Oyen, «The Vulnerable Authority of the Author of the Gospel of Mark. Re-Reading the Paradoxes», Vol. 91 (2010) 161-186
The article proceeds in three steps. The paradoxes in Mark 8,35; 9,35; 10,43-44 tell in their own way that the mystery of the passion and resurrection of Jesus is to be experienced by the followers of Jesus in daily life. They are not only anticipations but also actualizations of that mystery. These paradoxes cannot be understood without the Christological foundation that God has saved Jesus from the dead. The use of paradoxes is in agreement with Mark’s theology and Christology which as a whole is presented as a paradoxical story.
162 GEERT VAN OYEN
I. The paradoxes 8,35; 9,35b; 10,43-44 in their context
The rise of new literary criticism explains the growing
consensus to approach the gospel of Mark as a whole as one great
paradox. This is certainly one of the reasons why in recent years
the idea has been advanced to call Mark a “master of surpriseâ€
(D. Juel), to characterize his gospel as “an évangile étonnantâ€
(C. Focant), or to typify his theological narrative with the
oxymoronic expression “obscure clarté†(Y. Bourquin) 3. Mark’s
gospel is indeed a surprising text that grips the readers or audience
in a never ending way. Paradox — not only verbal but also
dramatic paradox — seems to be Mark’s preferred literary
expression by which he communicates and wants to stimulate the
readers’ thinking. This is certainly the case in three paradoxical
sayings which through their place in the gospel, their similar
construction and their content can be considered together as one
set : 8,35; 9,35b; 10,43-44 4. It is amazing that the amount of
literature on these related verses as a group is not extremely large,
and the rise of narrative criticism has certainly stimulated the
bringing together of them as a group of paradoxes 5. This small
D.H. JUEL, A Master of Surprise. Mark Interpreted (Mifflintown
3
PA, 2002) ; C. FOCANT, Marc, un évangile étonnant (BETL 194; Leuven 2006);
Y. BOURQUIN, Marc, une théologie de la fragilité. Obscure clarté d’une
narration (Le monde de la Bible 55; Genève: 2005). Note that these
descriptions of the gospel of Mark make use of literary categories, which might
be seen as a shift from the more theological ones given in the twentieth century:
“ b o o k of secret epiphanies†(M. D i b e l i u s ) , “mysterious revelationâ€
(T.A. Burkill) or “Crucified Messiah†(N. Dahl), all three mentioned by
FOWLER, Let the Reader Understand, 191.
FOWLER, Let the Reader Understand, 189, is right when he states that
4
in the three paradoxes “ we hear echoes of [the] daunting challengeâ€
of 8,34.
For bibliographical references before 1990, see the index of gospel
5
passages in F. NEIRYNCK et AL., The Gospel of Mark. A Cumulative
Bibliography 1950-1990 (BETL 102; Leuven 1992). More recently, see
N.F. SANTOS, “The Paradox of Authority and Servanthood in the Gospel of
Mark â€, Bibliotheca Sacra 154 (1997) 452-460; ID., “Jesus’ Paradoxical
Teaching in Mark 8:35; 9:35 and 10:43-44â€, Bibliotheca Sacra 157 (2000)
15-25 ; ID., Slave of All (2003); especially with regard to Mark 10,43-44:
F. VOUGA , Po l i t i q u e du Nouveau Testament. Leçons contemporaines
(Genève 2008) 73-87: ‘L’ambivalence du pouvoir et la force de la faiblesse: