Geert Van Oyen, «The Vulnerable Authority of the Author of the Gospel of Mark. Re-Reading the Paradoxes», Vol. 91 (2010) 161-186
The article proceeds in three steps. The paradoxes in Mark 8,35; 9,35; 10,43-44 tell in their own way that the mystery of the passion and resurrection of Jesus is to be experienced by the followers of Jesus in daily life. They are not only anticipations but also actualizations of that mystery. These paradoxes cannot be understood without the Christological foundation that God has saved Jesus from the dead. The use of paradoxes is in agreement with Mark’s theology and Christology which as a whole is presented as a paradoxical story.
168 GEERT VAN OYEN
status †(Donahue – Harrington 23). But what exactly is being taught
by the paradox? Some elements of an answer follow in 9,36-51.
The first paradox is said after Peter is rebuked because he did
not accept Jesus’ words about the passion. Peter, however, should
not think he might have an exceptional position. He must think like
“ the crowd with his disciples†(8,34) and deny himself. The second
paradox is said after the disciples argue with one another about who
is the greatest (9,34: tıv meızwn), thus, again, manifesting that
¥ ¥
indeed they had not understood (v. 32) Jesus’ teaching about his
passion (see their reaction of “silence†when Jesus asks them the
subject of their discussion, v. 34). Though the word “great†(megav)¥
is not repeated in v. 35 (but see further on, 10,43-44), the saying
with “first†(like in 6,21 = leaders) and its opposites “last of all†and
“ servant of all†makes clear what is meant by the willingness to be
great : striving to be the leader. After reading the extended form
(compared to the first half-verse) no one can have any doubt:
authority according to Jesus lies in serving all, without any
compromise (estai) and without any exception (repetition of
¶
pantwn) 24 ! The composition of the saying suggests a complete
Â¥
reversal of values: they should not even think about being the
greatest, they should only serve. But even more than the second
half-verse of the paradox, the example of Jesus’ taking apart a child
(v. 36) and the subsequent explanation (v. 37) illustrate how the
twelve should behave. Even if one accepts the interpretation that the
saying is about “actual children†and about the “issue whether
children ought to be welcomed as members of the community or
welcomed at communal gathering†25, this does not exclude a more
J.R. DONAHUE – D.J. HARRINGTON, The Gospel of Mark (Sacra
23
Pagina 2 ; Collegeville, KY 2002) 285.
With diakonov, the one who serves at the table stands for anyone who is
Â¥
24
serving the community (FOCANT, Marc, 357). — According to GUNDRY, Mark,
510, “all†“may not include people in general, for the passage deals with
intramural rivalry among disciplesâ€. But see the example of the child (9,36-37)
and the conflict with the outsider driving out demons (9,38).
YARBRO COLLINS, Mark, 445-446: the saying may be understood as an
25
exhortation to Gentile converts or poor parents not to expose or kill their
newborn children but to accept them. This interpretation is probably too
specific within the Markan context. For a completely different but equally
questionable explanation, that “believing adults will take the last place of a
servant who receives even children who believeâ€, see GUNDRY, Mark, 510.