Geert Van Oyen, «The Vulnerable Authority of the Author of the Gospel of Mark. Re-Reading the Paradoxes», Vol. 91 (2010) 161-186
The article proceeds in three steps. The paradoxes in Mark 8,35; 9,35; 10,43-44 tell in their own way that the mystery of the passion and resurrection of Jesus is to be experienced by the followers of Jesus in daily life. They are not only anticipations but also actualizations of that mystery. These paradoxes cannot be understood without the Christological foundation that God has saved Jesus from the dead. The use of paradoxes is in agreement with Mark’s theology and Christology which as a whole is presented as a paradoxical story.
173
THE VULNERABLE AUTHORITY AUTHOR
OF THE
dominance. They do not keep records of the amount of service they
have to perform in order to sit at the right hand in God’s glory. This
perspective is the starting point for Jesus. Within this framework he
would like to bring the disciples to a new way of thinking. He is not
saying that they will not have a place in the future glory, but he
criticizes them for not having entered into his paradoxical way of
thinking and living yet: serving should not be done with a view to
one’s own profit (“not to be self-aggrandizing and self-serving†38),
but with a view to every other person whom one is serving. The
paradox is very subtle: anyone who wants to be “great†or “first†(a
leader) in the community will have to serve, but in so doing he will
not be “great†or “first†in the eyes of the world, since there other
rules are applicable 39.
4. The context of a passion and resurrection prediction
Jesus’ teaching does not stop with the paradoxes. As in the first
two cases, we find the same composition: his sayings are integrated
into a Christological framework. “For the Son of Man came not to
be served but to serve, and to give his life a ransom for manyâ€
(10,45). Here, unlike 9,36-37, it is not a concrete example of Jesus
that is mentioned as the basis for the validation of the paradox, but
the example of his whole life. He gives his life in order to free
people. Whatever the exact interpretation of 10,45 40, in the context
YARBRO COLLINS, Mark, 499. She also compares the paradox to other
38
biblical texts (1 Kgs 12,7) and she gives several examples to illustrate that
Jesus’ teaching in vv. 41-45 is “similar to widely expressed Greek and Roman
ideals of leadershipâ€. FOCANT, Marc, 402, for his part, is rather critical: “En
fait, le texte de Marc est fort different de toutes ces traditionsâ€.
DE MINGO KAMINOUCHI, “‘But It Is Not So Among You’â€, 132: “The
39
second of the sayings in Mk10.42-45 is a commandment addressed to those
aspiring to become leaders among Jesus’ disciples. They are ordered to serve
and to become ‘slaves of all’. This saying is not a recommendation of kindness
towards fellow disciples. It stands in contrast with the description of the abuse
of power of the rulers in Mk 10.42b. It is a commandment to engage in
subversive practices of power. With their renunciation of domination and their
willingness to become ‘servants’ and ‘slaves of all’, these leaders should
promote a community of discipleship that stands as an alternative to the
structures of power of their worldâ€.
To summarize the endless debates about the interpretation of lytron
Â¥
40
antı pollwn in v. 45 is an impossible task. Apart from the explanations found
ßù ˜