Geert Van Oyen, «The Vulnerable Authority of the Author of the Gospel of Mark. Re-Reading the Paradoxes», Vol. 91 (2010) 161-186
The article proceeds in three steps. The paradoxes in Mark 8,35; 9,35; 10,43-44 tell in their own way that the mystery of the passion and resurrection of Jesus is to be experienced by the followers of Jesus in daily life. They are not only anticipations but also actualizations of that mystery. These paradoxes cannot be understood without the Christological foundation that God has saved Jesus from the dead. The use of paradoxes is in agreement with Mark’s theology and Christology which as a whole is presented as a paradoxical story.
163
THE VULNERABLE AUTHORITY AUTHOR
OF THE
amount of literature is amazing for at least two reasons, firstly
because even if it is possible that the literal wording of the sayings
is not authentic, there is no doubt that at least the idea expressed in
these paradoxes is “jesuanic†6 ; and secondly, because these verses
are at the heart of the gospel, in the section 8,27–10,52, and they
express the core of Jesus’ message in Mk. Let us have a closer
look at these sayings.
1. The first paradox (8,35)
The first paradox (8,35), “probably an independent one
originally †7, is about losing and finding one’s life: ov gar ean
™ ù ßù
uelq thn cyxhn aytoy swsai apolesei aythn. ov dà an
¥ ù ù ߘ˜ ß ¥ ߥ ™ û
apolesei thn cyxhn aytoy eneken emoy kaù toy eyaggel¥oy
ß ¥ ù ù ß ˜™ ߘ ı ˜ß ı
swsei aythn. The verse is part of a larger unit, which we can
¥ ߥ
define from 8,34 till 8,38(-9,1). This unit comes right after the first
passion and resurrection prediction (8,31). In this passage “[t]he
s ay i n g s are bound together by catchwords, similarities or
g r a m m a t i c a l structure, and connections of thought†8 . The
construction of the verse itself is an example of antithetic
parallelism, which intensifies the paradox.
Marc 10 :35-45’ ; on Mark 8,35parr.: U. SCHMIDT, “Zum Paradox vom
‘Verlieren’ und ‘Finden’ des Lebensâ€, Bib 89 (2008) 329-351. — A similar
remark was made by SANTOS, “Paradoxâ€, 452 n. 2 : “The few Marcan scholars
who have discussed paradox have treated this issue [= authority and
servanthood] in a generally cursory mannerâ€.
Thus, e.g., with regard to Mk 8,35parr., SCHMIDT, “Paradoxâ€, 330:
6
“ Trotz diverser zeitgeschichtlicher Parallelen, ist an der Echtheit des
jesuanischen Wortes nicht zu zweifeln†(with reference to Bultmann, Crossan,
Rebell). Many commentators mention the traditional character of (some of) the
sayings. J.D. CROSSAN, The Historical Jesus. The Life of a Mediterranean
Jewish Peasant (San Francisco, CA 1991) 353: “the original saying, as in the
Sayings Gospel Q version, goes back to Jesusâ€. J.P. MEIER, A Marginal Jew.
Rethinking the Historical Jesus (The Anchor Bible Reference Library; New
York 1991) II, has only indirect references to this verse and to the other
paradoxes.
A. YARBRO COLLINS, Mark (Hermeneia ; Minneapolis 2007) 408.
7
R.H. GUNDRY, Mark. A Commentary on His Apology for the Cross
8
(Grand Rapids, MI 1993) 434.