Geert Van Oyen, «The Vulnerable Authority of the Author of the Gospel of Mark. Re-Reading the Paradoxes», Vol. 91 (2010) 161-186
The article proceeds in three steps. The paradoxes in Mark 8,35; 9,35; 10,43-44 tell in their own way that the mystery of the passion and resurrection of Jesus is to be experienced by the followers of Jesus in daily life. They are not only anticipations but also actualizations of that mystery. These paradoxes cannot be understood without the Christological foundation that God has saved Jesus from the dead. The use of paradoxes is in agreement with Mark’s theology and Christology which as a whole is presented as a paradoxical story.
164 GEERT VAN OYEN
The question of the relationship of this verse with Q (or pre-Q?)
is debated 9. Mark 8,35 is the first of four gar-sayings which justify
ù
the idea of denying oneself found in 8,34 (a.o. Focant, Gundry).
And although the verse receives a metaphorical “translation†in vv.
36-37 (to gain the whole world, to forfeit one’s life, to give
something in return for one’s life, to be ashamed of Jesus), it
remains difficult to make very concrete what exactly “to save/lose
one’s life†means. Though a more traditional interpretation would
connect this saying and its context to the fate of death or martyrdom
of Jesus’ disciples following Jesus, there are several arguments
against thinking of “the shadow of deathâ€, especially death by
crucifixion, as the central issue 10. The emphasis may not exclusively
be on the recompense of suffering and death in this world in eternal
life. As U. Schmidt has shown, this idea of death may be a later
stage in the development of the paradox 11, but the more original
The verse plays a role in the so-called Mark-Q overlaps. The parallel
9
verses are Mark 8,35 // Matt 16,25 // Luke 9,24 and Matt 10,38 // Luke 17,33
(= Q). See the critique on the Q-hypothesis for this verse by F. NEIRYNCK,
“ Recent Developments in the Study of Qâ€, in Logia. Les paroles de Jésus –
The Sayings of Jesus (BETL 59; ed. J. DELOBEL ; Leuven 1982) 29-75; = ID.,
Evangelica II (BETL 99; Louvain 1991) 409-464, esp. 426-431: “If Lk 17,33 is
a rewriting of Mk 8,35, and there is no trace of Mt 10,39 in Lk 14,26-35, then
the ‘Q-saying’ is attested only in Mt 10,39. Its connection with 10,38 can be the
Matthaean editorial linking under the influence of Mk 8,(34-)35†(431).
NEIRYNCK, “Recent Developmentsâ€, 435-436; SCHMIDT, “Paradoxâ€,
10
351: “Es sollte deutlich geworden sein, dass das Paradoxon vom Verlieren und
Finden der cyxh nicht sofort und nicht hauptsächlich under dem ‘Schatten des
Â¥
Todes’ zu lessen istâ€.
S C H M I D T , “Paradoxâ€, 343-346. The idea of an eschatological
11
compensation can be seen in the Beatitudes (Matthew 5,3-11; Luke 6,20-23;
though the present tense in the beginning of the sayings and the Synoptic
tradition as a whole “drängen darauf, dass sich diese Zusagen – zumindest
teilweise – schon jetzt erfüllen†[344]), in the parable of the rich man and