Geert Van Oyen, «The Vulnerable Authority of the Author of the Gospel of Mark. Re-Reading the Paradoxes», Vol. 91 (2010) 161-186
The article proceeds in three steps. The paradoxes in Mark 8,35; 9,35; 10,43-44 tell in their own way that the mystery of the passion and resurrection of Jesus is to be experienced by the followers of Jesus in daily life. They are not only anticipations but also actualizations of that mystery. These paradoxes cannot be understood without the Christological foundation that God has saved Jesus from the dead. The use of paradoxes is in agreement with Mark’s theology and Christology which as a whole is presented as a paradoxical story.
175
THE VULNERABLE AUTHORITY AUTHOR
OF THE
In fact, we have here a way of being which illustrates the heart
of the gospel. Once again, we notice that if the paradox is linked to
the theme of the cross, this does not restrict the meaning of the
saying to crucifixion or martyrdom. The paradox offers a code with
regard to human relationships in everyday life within the
community. Starting with Peter’s “confessionâ€, the disciples never
stop struggling with these thoughts of Jesus. The reason why they
repeatedly do not understand is now clear: each time when the
message about the passion is announced, the reader learns that Jesus
then has to teach the disciples a lesson about losing one’s life and
serving in daily life.
In summary, each of the three paradoxes are set in the context of
a passion and resurrection prediction and a moment of the disciples’
failure to understand these announcements. Yet, through the
teaching given by Jesus they learn that his passion is merely the
consequence of a certain perspective on life, which can only be
expressed in a paradoxical way. One should not wait until
persecution or crucifixion comes to experience how these paradoxes
might function. They are to be lived here and now. Just before the
third passion and resurrection announcement (10,32-34) and after
the encounter with the rich young man (10,17-27), Jesus gives
another teaching (10,[28]29-31) to Peter (and the other disciples) 43.
This is another concrete example of how losing one’s life leads to
saving it. One recognizes the same characteristics as noted above:
general character (“there is no one... â€), Christological framework
(“ for my sake and for the sake of the good newsâ€), everyday life
(houses, brothers and sisters, ...â€). And it ends with a paradoxical
saying (v. 31) that functions as an encouragement and as a warning
to the disciples: “But many who are first will be last, and the last
will be firstâ€. The paradoxes are not only anticipations of the
See for instance SCHMIDT, “Paradoxâ€, 346: “Während in diesem Logion
[10,44] gewissermassen von einem Gewinn für denjenigen die Rede ist, der die
Sorge um seine cyxh aufgibt, so fehlt dieses Moment in Mt 20,28; Mk 10,45:
Â¥
Hier gewinnt der sich Hingebende nichts für sich, sondern ausschliesslich etwas
für die anderen bzw. für ‘viele’â€. See also GUNDRY, Mark, 589: “‘To give his
life . . . ’ specifies the kind of service he [Jesus] will perform. It need not imply
that the Twelve will perform the same kindâ€.
One could almost discover a sandwich structure in 10,28-31/32-34/35-45.
43
Jesus’ passion prediction is framed by two scenes in which disciples are
thinking they have privileges.