Floyd O. Parker, «Is the Subject of 'tetelestai' in John 19,30 'It' or 'All Things' ?», Vol. 96 (2015) 222-244
This article attempts to demonstrate that the unexpressed subject of tete/lestai in John 19,30 is 'all things' (pa/nta) rather than 'it', and that this subject should be supplied from the phrase pa/nta tete/lestai found earlier in the passage (John 19,28). The essay also argues that the two occurrences of 'all things' (John 18,4 and 19,28.30) encapsulate the passion narrative, and that this phrase is related to other Johannine themes in content and time frame (i.e. the 'hour', the 'cup', and the Passover).
04_Parker_222_244_222-244 10/07/15 12:41 Pagina 239
239 IS THE SUBJECT OF tete,lestai IN JOHN 19,30 “IT” OR “ALL THINGS” ? 239
VIhsou/j ou=n eivdw.j pa,nta ta. evrco,mena evpV auvto,n (18,4)
Meta. tou/to eivdw.j o` VIhsou/j o[ti h;dh pa,nta tete,lestai (19,28)
The wording of these two passages is remarkably similar; they
share the words “knowing” (eivdw,j), “all things” (pa,nta), and
“Jesus” (VIhsou/j). This close correspondence in the wording and
positioning of these two passages at either end of the chiasm
strongly suggests that the author intended to link them and that,
consequently, “all things” has the same referent in both cases.
The reason for the placement of these similar verses in the In-
troductory Stanza and Concluding Stanza at either end of the pas-
sion narrative is clear: they mark the onset (18,4) 56 and the
conclusion of the passion narrative (19,28) 57. As Schnackenburg
put it, “to Jesus’ knowledge of the future at the beginning of the
passion, there corresponds pa,nta tete,lestai (19:28) at its close” 58.
This information suggests that the “all things” that Jesus knew were
coming upon him while he was in the garden (18,4) corresponds
exactly to the “all things” that were completed just prior to his death
(19,28.30). In these passages, “all things” brackets the events of
the passion narrative.
If the phrase “all things” in 18,4 and 19,28 has been correctly
identified as marking off the boundaries of the passion narrative,
then this bit of evidence further confirms the decision to discard
several of the theories listed above. “All things” would refer only
to events found within the boundary of these two verses and would
disallow events that appear outside it or that describe merely a sin-
gle portion of it. Examples of theories that fall outside the bounds
of this section are the “works” and “signs” of Jesus, which were
completed long before the passion narrative and do not appear at
56
See WITKAMP, “Jesus’ Thirst”, 495: “If in 19:28 we read ‘knowing that
all was now completed’ … what is said first is that Jesus knew that the passion
was over. This is clear because of 18:4, where just before Jesus comes out of
the garden to be arrested, the narrator says, ‘Jesus, knowing all that was going
to happen to him’.”; WESTCOTT, St. John, 252, commenting on pa,nta ta.
evrco,mena in John 18,4, states, “The passion has already begun […] Jesus is
omniscient. He knows what is now about to befall him: he knows that the
“hour” announced long since has finally struck”; HAENCHEN, John, II, 165.
57
EPHRAIM, “On Our Lord”, 321; EDERSHEIM, Life and Times, II, 608-609;
BERNARD, St. John. II, 638; WITKAMP, “Jesus’ Thirst”, 495.
58
SCHNACKENBURG, St. John, III, 223.