Floyd O. Parker, «Is the Subject of 'tetelestai' in John 19,30 'It' or 'All Things' ?», Vol. 96 (2015) 222-244
This article attempts to demonstrate that the unexpressed subject of tete/lestai in John 19,30 is 'all things' (pa/nta) rather than 'it', and that this subject should be supplied from the phrase pa/nta tete/lestai found earlier in the passage (John 19,28). The essay also argues that the two occurrences of 'all things' (John 18,4 and 19,28.30) encapsulate the passion narrative, and that this phrase is related to other Johannine themes in content and time frame (i.e. the 'hour', the 'cup', and the Passover).
04_Parker_222_244_222-244 10/07/15 12:41 Pagina 238
238 FLOYD O. PARKER JR. 238
Jesus knows “all things” are finished (19,28, eivdw.j o` VIhsou/j […]
pa,nta)
Jesus drinks the vinegar given by the soldiers (19,28) 55
Jesus’ body is taken and bound (19,40, e;labon ou=n to. sw/ma tou/ VIhsou/
kai. e;dhsan auvto,)
Jesus is buried near a garden (19,41, kh/poj( kai. evn tw/| kh,pw|).
The garden is near the “place” of crucifixion (19,19, o` to,poj; 19,20,
o` to,poj)
The Introductory Stanza (18,1-27) and the Concluding Stanza
(19,16b-42) are connected by at least ten features: (1) a garden
(18,1; 19,41); (2) the word “place” (18,2; 19,19.20); (3) soldiers
(18,3; 19,23); (4) the high priest(s) (18,19; 19,21); (5) Jesus’ aware-
ness of “all things” (18,4; 19,28); (6) the title “Jesus of Nazareth”
(18,7; 19,19); (7) the fulfillment of Scripture (18,9; 19,24.36); (8)
the mention of Jesus’ drinking (18,11; 19,28); (9) the taking and
binding of Jesus (18,12; 19,40); and (10) a major character (i.e.
Peter or Mary) stands near the beloved (or “other”) disciple
(18,15.16; 19,25). These ten correspondences build a sound case
that the Introductory Stanza and the Concluding Stanza should be
considered a part of the chiasm presented above or, at the very least,
a frame for the trial scenes.
A moderate case could be mounted that Burge’s central chiasm
(18,28 – 19,16) actually serves the agenda of the Introductory and
Concluding sections, for the climax of the story should be the cru-
cifixion, not the trial scenes. Furthermore, the passion narrative
consistently develops themes like “king” (18,33.39-40; 19,3.12.14-
15.19.21) and “kingdom” (18,33.36-37) through its entirety. For
instance, the Introductory Stanza begins with the arrest of “Jesus
the Nazarene” (18,5.7), and the trial scenes introduce the title “King
of the Jews” (18,33.39; 19.3), but it is only in the Concluding
Stanza that the two elements are climactically combined on the
titulus as “Jesus the Nazarene, King of the Jews” (19,19).
Although the discovery of these additions to the chiasm is sig-
nificant in its own right, its value for this paper is that it highlights
the phrase “all things” (pa,nta) at either end of the passion narrative
(18,4; 19,28):
55
The connection between 18,11 and 19,28 was suggested by WITKAMP,
“Jesus’ Thirst”, 502.