Preston Kavanagh, «The Jehoiachin Code in Scripture’s Priestly Benediction», Vol. 88 (2007) 234-244
Coding in the OT is plausible because of the Exile’s profusion of scripture, the Diaspora’s need for secure communication, and the ancient world’s widespread use of cryptography. A code exists in Num 6,24-26 that uses one letter per text word, from words spaced at regular intervals, with letters used in any sequence. Coding of Jehoiachin’s name in the MT’s Priestly Benediction establishes the mid-sixth century B.C.E. as the earliest possible time for the Ketef Hinnom amulets. Moreover, since the Ketef Hinnom scribe appears to have understood nothing of the benediction’s Jehoiachin coding, the amulets could be considerably later than mid-sixth century.
The Jehoiachin Code in Scripture’s Priestly Benediction 235
this time. Many Jews made it to nearby Samaria, which did not participate in
Judah’s revolt. Trade may further have expanded the dispersion that war had
begun. As the Exile wore on, Jewish merchants, centered in Babylonia and
elsewhere, might in their travels have crisscrossed the ancient world. This
supposition gains support from a trove of documents unearthed at Nippur. An
archive of the Murashu family shows Jews were heavily involved in
commercial activities during the century following the Exile (10).
In a few years the Judeans had passed from a settled to a scattered people.
That physical dispersion makes coded communication plausible, since those
in the Diaspora would have wanted important questions answered. How soon
would God liberate His exiles? What alliance was forming against Babylon?
On which projects were captives laboring? Could Tyre withstand its siege or
Egypt expel its invaders? Was Jehoiachin in prison and would David’s line
endure? What was the state of worship at Jerusalem’s ruined temple and
which priestly group held control? On an even more personal basis, virtually
every refugee now had a relative someplace else. He or she would have been
eager for news of that relative and that someplace else. These were questions
of lively interest that often could not have been openly addressed.
How would information have been gathered? Possibly Judeans had
access to official sources within the Egyptian and Babylonian courts. A
Joseph or a Daniel who had risen to high position could have contributed, as
could scribes, merchants, travelers, and domestic servants. One can even
imagine a network of couriers with stops and sources spanning the Fertile
Crescent.
Assuming there was a code, if writers encoded scripture, others would
have had to decode it. Probably few exiles would have had the training to
decode any scripture bulletins their communities might receive. That would
have been a task for experts — scribes, priests, and Levites. Any decoding
would have called for lots of counting and tabulation, and also for layout
boards and word lists. It would have been difficult and tedious labor, best
done by careful people working individually. Once decoded, the information
would have been widely shared, though with due care to conceal that there
was a code. If synagogues got their start during the Exile, they could have
become centers of this work.
Some of the kingdoms bordering Judah welcomed fugitive Jews, some
tolerated them, and a few may have enslaved them or turned them away. But
whatever the reception, the refugees’ new rulers were foreign rulers. To
complicate matters, some of the places to which Jews fled either were
governed by Babylon or allied with it. Nearby Samaria was a Babylonian
province. Syria, to its north, had already fallen to Nebuchadnezzar. Edom had
joined the Babylonians in their campaign against Judah. Whatever the extent
of Babylonian influence, local officials would not have welcomed openly anti-
Babylonian sentiments from Judean refugees. Coded scripture was a way for
the exiles to express such views while staying on the better sides of their hosts.
In Babylonia itself the risk must have been especially high. Ezekiel, King
Jehoiachin, and other exiles lived under the eye of Nebuchadnezzar’s officials
and informers, and perhaps were held directly responsible for happenings in
(10) D.B. WEISBURG, “Murashu’s Sonsâ€, EncJud XII, 529.