Luca Marulli, «A Letter of Recommendation? A Closer look at Third John’s “rhetorical” Argumentation», Vol. 90 (2009) 203-223
Previous studies argue that the Elder composed the letter to recommend Demetrius to Gaius, and that Third John therefore falls into the “letter of recommendation” genre. After assessing the differences between common letters of recommendation and Third John, this study examines the rhetoric of Third John in an attempt to show that it is not a letter of recommendation, but rather an epideictic rhetorical attempt to restore the Elder’s honor (discredited by Diotrephes) in Gaius’ eyes and persuade him to detach himself from Diotrephes’ reprehensible behavior by extending hospitality to the Elder’s envoys.
A Letter of Recommendation? 211
The exordium of the letter is thus a somewhat explicit attempt to
gain Gaius’ favor by highlighting his spiritual prosperity, his
faithfulness, and praiseworthy general behavior, which, of course,
brings great joy to the Elder himself. It is not clear yet if the Elder
believes Gaius to be already on his side or if he feels the need to
persuade him.
c) Commission to Gaius / bad (“pagansâ€) and good (“weâ€) examples
(vv. 5-8)
A second vocative (after that of v. 2) marks the beginning of a new
section. The Elder now moves from praise to request, but with tact and
always upholding Gaius’ laudable behavior and presumed willingness
to keep and achieve honor as his main argument. In fact, the Elder
again proceeds by praising Gaius for what he “faithfully does†(pisto;n
poiei'", v. 5). He also refers to a specific occasion in which “the
brothers†testified to Gaius’ love before the church (v. 6a) (34).
However, the Elder is very vague in defining the occasion and content
of Gaius’ actions: “whatever you work towards the brothers especially
[when they are] stranger†(v. 5) is a very indefinite construction which
employs ejavn followed by the aorist subjunctive of the verb
ejrgavzomai(35). This description of the brothers as “strangers†suggests
that the Elder is probably alluding to hospitality, but there is no
indication that Gaius has already extended hospitality to the brothers.
The overall impression one gets of this section of the letter is that the
Elder is praising Gaius for his “general†praiseworthy behavior and
attitude, which is well known by the brethren. The Elder suggests that
because of this honorable reputation, Gaius should be ready to
eventually give further proof of his commendable Christian character
by extending hospitality to some brother, even if a stranger, connected
with the Elder. In ancient Mediterranean culture, hospitality was a
sacred bond and refusing it to a friend or to a friend’s envoy would
have been considered shameful (cf. Rhet. Her. 3,3,4).
At this juncture, the suggestion becomes an invitation: “you will
do well to send them in a manner worthy of God†(ou}" kalw'" poihvsei"
propevmya" ajxivw" tou' qeou', v. 6b). The verb propevmpw clearly has the
meaning of “equipping someone with the necessary provisions when
(34) So should be understood the meaning if the aorist indicative ejmartuvrhsavn
(“they bore witnessâ€). Cf. LIEU, Epistles of John, 104.
(35) S. LANGDON, “History of the use of ejavn for a[n in Relative Clausesâ€,
American Journal of Philology 24 (1903) 447-451.