Luca Marulli, «A Letter of Recommendation? A Closer look at Third John’s “rhetorical” Argumentation», Vol. 90 (2009) 203-223
Previous studies argue that the Elder composed the letter to recommend Demetrius to Gaius, and that Third John therefore falls into the “letter of recommendation” genre. After assessing the differences between common letters of recommendation and Third John, this study examines the rhetoric of Third John in an attempt to show that it is not a letter of recommendation, but rather an epideictic rhetorical attempt to restore the Elder’s honor (discredited by Diotrephes) in Gaius’ eyes and persuade him to detach himself from Diotrephes’ reprehensible behavior by extending hospitality to the Elder’s envoys.
212 Luca Marulli
he sets forth on a journey†(cf. Acts 15,3; 21,5; Titus 3,13). Paul refers
precisely to this kind of support in 1 Cor 9,4-14, as he also depended
on Christian’s hospitality (cf. 1 Cor 16,5-6; Phlm 22) (36). The
expression kalw'" poihvsei" is well attested in the papyri, and seems to
indicate a “cautious request†(37). However, the Elder continues to build
his case to achieve his real goal: explicitly solicit Gaius’ support. The
brethren, the Elder presses, “went out for the sake of the Name†(tou'
ojnovmato" ejxhvlqon, v. 7a). This is no occasional aside: in the ancient
world, the manner in which a person’s name was treated affected his or
her honor. The fact that the itinerants bear “the Name†makes them
worthy of being treated with the honor due to Jesus. Failing to do so
would not only disgrace the brethren, but be an affront to Christ
himself (38). The need of honoring “the Name†together with the notion
of “hospitality†as a necessary endeavor towards friends’ envoys (39) (to
preserve and reciprocate honor) strengthens the Elder’s basis for
requesting Gaius’ support.
The Elder artfully adds, in the second part of v. 7, that the itinerants
“have been receiving nothing from the pagans (40)â€. We believe that the
expression mhde;n lambavnonte" should be translated as “receiving
(36) POLHILL, “The setting of 2 John and 3 Johnâ€, 35. In ancient times,
hospitality meant more than just hosting somebody: it was expected to provide
the travelers with all they might need to continue their journey. Traveling in the
ancient world was a dangerous activity. Robbers, wild animals, and unsafe,
immoral hostels were real concerns for any traveler (Cf. Luke 10,25-37and Mek.
Exod. 2: R.W. GEHRING, House Church and Mission. The Importance of
Household Structures in Early Christianity [Peabody, MA 2004] 287).
(37) KLAUCK, Ancient Letters, 34, who notes that P. Oxy II,299,3-4 uses the
same expression.
(38) As C.G. KRUSE, The Letters of John (The Pillar New Testament
Commentary; Grand Rapids, MI 2000) 224 noted, the context of the other usages
of this expression in the New Testament is one of persecution (Acts 5,41; 9,16;
15,26; 21,13. Rom 1,5 is an exception, as the topic is Paul’s mission “to bring
about the obedience of faith…among all the nationsâ€). It is also very possible that
the Elder alludes to the fact that his people have been and will be — because of
the very nature of their mission — persecuted. However, we cannot ignore that in
this honor-shame based culture, among the symbols of honor, the “name†had
great relevance. For some examples of “honoring the name†see Ps 29,2; 34,3;
Tob 3,11; 8,5; 11,14; Matt 6,9; John 17,6.26; Rom 9,17; 15,9; “despising the
nameâ€: see Ps 9,5; Is 52,5; Rom 2,24; 1 Tim 6,1 (DESILVA, Honor Discourse,
120; Patronage, 32).
(39) DESILVA, Honor Discourse, 16. Cf. Rhet. Her. 3,3,4.
(40) ajpo; tw'n ejnikw'n does not seem to have here an ethnic connotation, since
Gaius and Demetrius were Gentiles themselves, bearing Greek names.