Callia Rulmu, «Between Ambition and Quietism: the Socio-political Background of 1 Thessalonians 4,9-12», Vol. 91 (2010) 393-417
Assuming the Christian group of Thessalonica to be a professional voluntary association of hand-workers (probably leatherworkers), this paper argues that 1 Thessalonians in general, and especially the injunction to «keep quiet» (4,11), indicates Paul’s apprehension regarding how Roman rulers, city dwellers, and Greek oligarchies would perceive an association converted to an exclusive cult and eager to actively participate in the redistribution of the city resources. Paul, concerned about a definite practical situation rather than a philosophically or even theologically determined attitude, delivered precise counsel to the Thessalonians to take a stance of political quietism as a survival strategy.
396 CALLIA RULMU
the lower ranks of society, some of whom were probably “already
involved in some form of voluntary association†16. Since Paul’s
advice to this specific group is to keep a low profile and respect the
order of things (1 Thess 5,14) so as to avoid any unnecessary
publicity and possible hostility, an ulterior look at the “very real
danger in belonging to an unrecognized society during the imperial
period †may be required 17. As Cotter suggested, there is a need to
properly weigh “the clear evidence of Roman prohibition of such
societies and the constant threat of their sudden investigation and
dissolution †18.
During the Roman Empire, Macedonia maintained its strong
Greek character (cf. Livy 31.29) 19. Thessalonica had been its
capital since 146 BCE. In Paul’s day, in addition to her Greek
heritage, the city of Thessalonica had a strong Roman presence
and influence 20. Thessalonica was already well-known for its role
during the civil wars that burst out in the first century BCE for the
control of the Republic and, later, the Empire. Pompey established
its headquarters in the city in 48 BCE. A few years later, when
Julius Caesar was murdered (44 BCE), Thessalonica supported
Brutus and Cassius. In neither case did the Macedonian city make
a far-sighted choice. To be sure, the Thessalonians were wise and
we delight in the work [of craftsmen and artisans], we despise the
workman . . . it does not necessarily follow that, if the work delights you with its
graces, the one who wrought it is worthy of your esteemâ€, quoted by WINTER,
“ ’If a Man’â€, 304; see also HOCK, The Social Context, 35-36.
ASCOUGH, “The Thessalonianâ€, 315.
16
W. COTTER, “The Collegia and Roman Law. State restrictions on volun-
17
tary associations, 64 BCE – 200 CEâ€, Voluntary Associations in the Graeco-
Roman World (eds. J.S. KLOPPENBORG — S.G. WILSON) (London and New
York 1996) 88.
COTTER, “The Collegiaâ€, 88. See also I. ARNAOUTOGLOU, “Roman Law
18
and Collegia in Asia Minorâ€, RIDA 49 (3e série ; 2002) 27-44, who shows
that the application of restrictions against associations was highly selective
and very local.
For a description of Macedonia during the Roman Empire see:
19
M.B. COSMOPOULOS, Macedonia. An Introduction to its Political History
(Winnipeg 1992) 49-51: “Macedonians in the Roman period had a strong
Greek conscience, spoke Greek, and were considered Greeks by the Roman
administration †(51). On the administration of the Eastern cities during the
first century see R. MACMULLEN, Enemies of the Roman Order. Treason, Un-
rest, and Alienation in the Empire (Cambridge, MA 1966) 165-168.
H.L. HENDRIX, “Thessalonicaâ€, ABD 6, 523-527.
20