Callia Rulmu, «Between Ambition and Quietism: the Socio-political Background of 1 Thessalonians 4,9-12», Vol. 91 (2010) 393-417
Assuming the Christian group of Thessalonica to be a professional voluntary association of hand-workers (probably leatherworkers), this paper argues that 1 Thessalonians in general, and especially the injunction to «keep quiet» (4,11), indicates Paul’s apprehension regarding how Roman rulers, city dwellers, and Greek oligarchies would perceive an association converted to an exclusive cult and eager to actively participate in the redistribution of the city resources. Paul, concerned about a definite practical situation rather than a philosophically or even theologically determined attitude, delivered precise counsel to the Thessalonians to take a stance of political quietism as a survival strategy.
397
BETWEEN AMBITION QUIETISM
AND
quick enough to redirect their support to Octavian and Anthony,
thus becoming a civitas libera in 42 BCE (Plutarch, Brut. 46 ; Pliny
the Elder, Nat. 3.36) 21. When Octavian and Anthony turned on
each other, Thessalonica stood at first for Anthony, even to the
point of inaugurating a new era in his honour. But after Octavian’s
decisive victory over Anthony in 31 BCE at the battle of Actium,
Thessalonica was again quick to switch its allegiance, and became
a supporter of the new Emperor. Jerome Murphy-O’Connor
informs us about erased inscriptions dating from this period that
bear witness to the Thessalonians early commitment to Mark
Anthony, but also their subsequent ‘embarrassment’ and proverbial
adeptness in redressing an unfortunate situation 22.
B e c a u s e of its behavior in recent history, the city of
Thessalonica was not seen as embodying the ideals of unconditional
faithfulness to Rome or any other ruling entity in the first century
CE. This fact surely played a role in how Roman authorities and also
Greek rulers viewed the local voluntary associations and guilds,
since these corporations were eager to play a political role in the
arena of their own city.
2. Common Distrust Against Voluntary Associations
During the first century, Thessalonica had very low wages and
l imi t ed opportunities for employment. Such a discouraging
situation would naturally lead to widespread unemployment and
even idleness (cf. 1 Thess 4,11-12). A logical outcome of this state
was the impoverishment of lower status workers, who would turn to
their association for support 23. Bruce W. Winter points out that in
time of famine, Roman citizens were entitled to a monthly dole of
corn 24. But since “few in the Thessalonian congregation [...]
qualified if the dole was given to Roman citizens in that city†25, the
ASCOUGH, Voluntary Associations, 48.
21
J. MURPHY-O’CONNOR, Paul. A Critical Life (Oxford 1996) 15; see also
22
HENDRIX, “Thessalonicaâ€, 523-527 and IG X/2 83, cited by ASCOUGH, Volun-
tary Associations, 109.
R. RUSSEL, “The Idle in 2 Thess 3.6-12: An Eschatological or a Social
23
Problem ? â€, NTS 34 (1988) 112.
WINTER, “‘If a Man’â€, 309.
24
WINTER, “‘If a Man’â€, 310. R. MACMULLEN, Roman Social Relations
25
50 B.C. to A.D. 284 (New Haven – London 1974) 167.