Étienne Nodet, «On Jesus' Last Supper», Vol. 91 (2010) 348-369
In the Gospels, Jesus' last supper involves custom and legal issues: chronological discrepancies between the Synoptics and John, a mock trial before the Sanhedrin, two trials before Pilate (John), and so on. This study focuses on the calendar problem, a topic of utmost importance in ancient Judaism, and follows A. Jaubert's hypothesis, against J. Jeremias' now classical view: the Synoptics display a somewhat loose connection with the Jubilees sectarian calendar, while John's chronology seems to be historically more accurate.
351
ON JESUS’ LAST SUPPER
– in 33, Friday, April 3rd ;
– in 34, Thursday, April 23rd (only if a leap month was inserted
at the end of the previous year, because of exceptionally bad
weather delaying the ripening of the barley firstfruits) 4.
The first date is too early. Luke 2,1-2 states that John the
Baptist began his ministry in the 15th year of Tiberius Caesar, that
is 28–29 or 29–30, depending on the reckoning of the Seleucid era
(340). According to John 2,20, the Temple reconstruction was
started 46 years before Jesus came for his first public Passover in
Jerusalem. Since Herod launched the work in Autumn 19 BCE, the
earliest possible date is Passover 28.
The year 34 is only a remote possibility, for it falls more than
a lunar month after the equinox. Moreover, it may conflict with the
probable date of Paul’s conversion (34).
So the two remaining possibilities are 30 and 33. Both match
John’s chronology 5, as well as other details in the NT: the
equation of Jesus’ death with the slaughtering of the Passover lamb
is given in John 1,29, as well as in 1 Cor 5,7. A Talmudic saying 6
leads to the same conclusion (b.Sanh 43a) : “On the eve of
Passover, Jesus of Nazareth (or rather: “the Nazorean†yrxwn wçy)
was crucified (lit. hanged, whwalt)â€; it is stated that the (Roman)
authorities sought to defend him. According to Jewish law, he
should have been stoned then exposed (“hangedâ€, cf. Deut 21,22;
Ant. 4 :206). This short account cannot be directly dependent on
the Gospels, for a list of five disciples is added, in which only one
can be recognized (ytm, Matthew).
C.J. HUMPHREYS – W.G. WADDINGTON, “Astronomy and the Date of the
4
Crucifixion â€, Chronos, Kairos, Christos. Nativity and Chronological Studies
Presented to Jack Finegan (eds. J. VARDAMAN – E. M. YAMAUCHI) (Winona
Lake, MI 1989) 165-182. These results refine the conclusions of K. SCHOCH,
“ Christi Kreuzigung am 14. Nissanâ€, Bib 9 (1928) 48-56, who gave another
possibility : Thursday, April 26th, 31 (now replaced with Tuesday, March 27th for
that year).
And the Gospel of Peter 2,5, but it cannot be held as a major witness.
5
Uncensored, cf. R. RABBINOVICZ, Variae Lectiones in Mischnam et in
6
Talmud Babylonicum. Tract. Synhedrin (Leiden 1877) ad locum. The traditional
e ditions have only “On the eve of Passover, Jesus was hangedâ€, and
G. DALMAN, Jesus-Jeshua (London – New York 1922) 89, tried to discard this
testimony by surmising that it concerns another Jesus, a disciple of Yehoshua b.
Perahiah (cf. b.Sanh 107b).