Étienne Nodet, «On Jesus' Last Supper», Vol. 91 (2010) 348-369
In the Gospels, Jesus' last supper involves custom and legal issues: chronological discrepancies between the Synoptics and John, a mock trial before the Sanhedrin, two trials before Pilate (John), and so on. This study focuses on the calendar problem, a topic of utmost importance in ancient Judaism, and follows A. Jaubert's hypothesis, against J. Jeremias' now classical view: the Synoptics display a somewhat loose connection with the Jubilees sectarian calendar, while John's chronology seems to be historically more accurate.
360 ÉTIENNE NODET
Biblical scholars 26, but with some reservations for the special
days 27.
These observations can be strengthened by other details. The
Creation week, discussed above, launches a non-lunar calendar, in
which the days begin in the evening. However, in the definition of
the days of the cultic calendar, they begin in the morning. For
example, the Passover lamb must be slaughtered on the 14th of the
first month and eaten in the evening, and the Israelites were
brought out from Egypt “that very day†28, which was the night of
the 14th (Exod 12,6.17). The Day of Atonement falls on the 10th of
the seventh month, but it begins “on the eve of the 9th day â€. This
implies a reckoning of the days from the morning, for otherwise it
would start one day before (Lev 23,32). According to Lev 22,29-
30, the sacrifices of thanksgiving shall be eaten on the same day,
without leaving any of it until morning; so the “day†includes the
following night. Indeed, this was the rule at the Jerusalem Temple
(b.Hulin 83a). Any cleansing that was performed by daylight, only
took effect after sunset of the same day (Num 19,7). Other
passages suggest the same definition of the day 29.
Al-Biruni adds that for the Maghariyya the beginning of the
first month is a Wednesday with a full moon. This cannot be true
See H. CAZELLES, “Sur les origines du calendrier des Jubilésâ€, Bib 43
26
(1962) 202-212, who cites many ancient sources. A major disagreement was
voiced by B.Z. WACHOLDER, “Patterns of Biblical Dates and Qumran’s Calen-
dar : The Fallacy of Jaubert’s Hypothesisâ€, HUCA 66 (1996) 1-40, but he fo-
cuses on the later books (1-2 Chr, Est). In the Bible, the lunar calendar appears
when the months are given Babylonian names (Nisan, Iyyar, and so on).
See J.C. VANDERKAM, “The Origin, Character and Early History of the
27
364-Day Calendar: A Reassessment of Jaubert’s Hypothesisâ€, CBQ 41 (1979)
3 9 0 - 411 ; P.R. DAVIES , “Calendrical Change and Qumran Origin: An
Assessment of VanderKam’s Theoryâ€, CBQ 45 (1983) 80-89.
A special problem arises regarding the seven days of Unleavened
28
Bread : they begin on the 15th according to Lev 23,6 and Num 28,17, but they
run from the evening of the 14th to the evening of the 21st This is an
anticipation prompted by the narrative, see É. NODET, “Pâque, azymes et
théorie documentaireâ€, RB 114 (2007) 499-534.
See J.Z. LAUTERBACH, Rabbinic Essays (Cincinnati, OH 1951) 446-450.
29
Other instances were given by J.MORGENSTERN, “The Sources of the Creation
Story â€, American Journal of Semitic Languages and Literature 36 (1919) 176.
R.T. BECKWITH, Calendar and Chronology, Jewish and Christian (Leiden
1996) 3-6, challenges the significance of these passages, but his short biblical
analyses are unsatisfactory.