Étienne Nodet, «On Jesus' Last Supper», Vol. 91 (2010) 348-369
In the Gospels, Jesus' last supper involves custom and legal issues: chronological discrepancies between the Synoptics and John, a mock trial before the Sanhedrin, two trials before Pilate (John), and so on. This study focuses on the calendar problem, a topic of utmost importance in ancient Judaism, and follows A. Jaubert's hypothesis, against J. Jeremias' now classical view: the Synoptics display a somewhat loose connection with the Jubilees sectarian calendar, while John's chronology seems to be historically more accurate.
361
ON JESUS’ LAST SUPPER
every year, but it is clearly true for the Creation week: on the 4th
day of the first year the lesser luminary was a full moon. It seems
that Al-Biruni was aware of a general introduction like that of 4Q
320 quoted above 30. As for the thesis of a hidden calendar, it
should first be noted that the most common Hebrew word for
“ month †is çdj 31, whose natural meaning is “newâ€, that is, “new
moon â€. Any other meaning is a distortion. Now, at the time of the
exodus from Egypt, a new calendar was introduced (Exod 12,2):
“ This month shall be for you the beginning of the monthsâ€.
Rabbinic tradition understands that this reckoning from Nisan
gives the dating of the festivals and the kings, while the Creation
year begins at Tishri, six months later (m.Rosh ha-Shanah 1:1), all
according to the lunar calendar with its Babylonian month names.
But the night of the first Passover in Egypt and the departure of the
Israelites occurred in full darkness (Exod 12,29-31), which is to
say, at the time of a new moon. Elsewhere it is said that Passover
has to be celebrated bybah çdj d[wml (Exod 23,15; Deut 16,1); this
is usually translated “at the appointed time in the month of Abibâ€,
but can be better understood as “at the appointed time at the new
moon of Abibâ€, especially since both passages state that the feast
is a memorial of the departure from Egypt. The moon signals the
specific time (see Gen 1,14), but as in the case of the Creation
week, the plain meaning refers only to the first year and no
explanation is given for any adjustment in the following years.
Something is hidden — or never existed. Later, in the Hellenistic
and Roman periods, the Babylonian lunar calendar prevailed, but
we do not know when and how the calendrical change was
enforced 32. Anyhow, the purpose of both Jubilees and the Cairo
document makes sense, although we do not know which secret
See too J.T. MILIK, Ten Years of Discoveries in the Wilderness of Judaea
30
(London 1959) 152.
The other one jry derives directly from “moonâ€, and indicates a period of
31
about 30 days, without any calendrical implications, see Exod 2,2; Deut 21,12;
2 Kgs 15,13.
Some think this occurred in Palestine after the battle of Karkemish in 604
32
BC, after which Palestine came under the Babylonian supremacy, see
E. AUERBACH, “Der Wechsel des Jahres-Anfang in Juda im Lichte der
neugefundenen babylonischen Chronikâ€, VT 9 (1959) 113-121; A. LEMAIRE,
“ Le sabbat à l’époque royale israéliteâ€, RB 80 (1973) 161-185. But no hint of the
change can be found in Jer and 2 Kgs. Later Ezra still uses the numbered