Nili Samet, «The Gilgamesh Epic and the Book of Qohelet: A New Look», Vol. 96 (2015) 375-390
This paper re-examines the relation between the Gilgamesh tradition and Qohelet. It presents formerly recognized analogies between the two texts, along with a newly identified parallel. Analysis of the data indicates that Gilgamesh is the only currently known ancient text that can be considered a direct literary source of Qohelet. The paper then discusses the nature of the Gilgamesh epic used by Qohelet's author. It shows that this version is not identical with any Gilgamesh recension known to us. Consequently, an attempt is made to describe this unique Gilgamesh version, and to locate it within Qohelet's historical and intellectual context.
03_Samet_375_375_390 30/10/15 13:05 Pagina 381
381 THE GILGAMESH EPIC AND THE BOOK OF QOHELET: A NEW LOOK 381
Here too, the similarity seems to be distinctive enough to point to
a genetic relation between the two texts. It is not only the general mes-
sage regarding the advantage of teamwork vs. individual work that is
identical, but also the specific simile of the three-ply cord, whose
unique occurrence in both texts is very unlikely to be accidental 19.
Kramer’s insight was developed by Aaron Shaffer, who succeeded
in identifying the Akkadian link between the early second millen-
nium Sumerian text and the biblical book 20. The link was found in
the fifth tablet of the Standard Babylonian Gilgamesh epic. In this
version, the dispute between Gilgamesh and Enkidu is severely
damaged. It seems that here it is Enkidu who attempts to persuade
Gilgamesh to fight Humbaba, and not vice versa. The following
fragmentary lines of Enkidu’s speech are preserved 21:
“Humbaba’s…
[On] one, one alone…
[Two] garments, however…
[Though] it is a glacis slope… two…
Two triplets…
A three-ply cord…
As for the mighty lion, [his] two cubs…”
Despite its bad state of preservation, this passage reveals several
clear parallels to the Biblical source. When presenting the advantage
of collaboration, the passage from Gilgamesh uses the numerical
pattern 1-2-3: it begins with one, probably to contrast his weakness
with the power of two, then ending with the three-ply cord, which
represents the strength of three. Qohelet uses the very same pattern:
at first he contrasts between one and two, and then refers to the ad-
vantage of three.
A thorough reading of both passages reveals additional links be-
tween them. In the biblical passage, the advantage of two over one
is depicted using three images: they support each other when stum-
bling; they warm each other on a cold night; and they cooperate in
defending themselves against an attacker. These images do not de-
19
Contra VAN DER TOORN, “Echoes”, 506; this motif is not known to us
from other sources.
20
SHAFFER, “Mesopotamian Background”; ID., “New Light on the Three-
ply Cord”, Eretz Israel 9 (1969) 159-160.
21
GEORGE, Gilgamesh I, 604-607.