Israel Finkelstein, «The Old Jephthah Tale in Judges: Geographical and Historical Considerations.», Vol. 97 (2016) 1-15
In this article I intend to reveal the old, orally-transmitted heroic tale that lies behind the Jephthah story in the Book of Judges, which is obscured by massive Deuteronomistic and post-Deuteronomistic additions and redactions. The old story deals with a conflict on the settlement boundary between Israelites and Ammonites in Transjordan, around the towns of Gilead and Mizpah. It probably reflects realities before, or in the early days of the Northern kingdom.
6 ISRAel FINkelSTeIN
ing, “and the men of Gilead smote ephraim, because they said, ‘You
are fugitives of ephraim, you Gileadites, in the midst of ephraim and
Manasseh’” (12,4b), is difficult to understand.
The Deuteronomistic parts in the Jephthah narrative are relatively easy
to identify:
▪ 10,6-16 is the typical frame of sin, punishment and cry to YhWh
that serves the overall ideology of the Deuteronomist in Judges.
here it is mixed with later, post-Deuteronomistic additions
(below). unlike other cycles in Judges, the selection of a savior
by YhWh is missing here 24.
▪ Gilead as the father of Jephthah in 11,1-2. The author no longer
understands that Gilead is the name of a town and connects
Jephthah to the Manasseh genealogy. This can either be a
Deuteronomistic, or post-Deuteronomistic redaction.
▪ The discussion between Jephthah and the elders of the town
(below) of Gilead in 11,7-10 is not part of the old narrative.
YhWh plays a major role here.
▪ 11,11b, “and Jephthah spoke all his words before the lORD at
Mizpah”, also does not belong to the old tale. Interestingly, the
author seems to know about a temple of YhWh at Mizpah (for
the town see below) and does not reject it; similar to references
to patriarchal altars in Genesis, countryside altars had been
accepted “before” the rule of the Davidic Dynasty in Jerusalem.
Or, the author no longer knew about Mizpah of the Gilead and
confused it with Mizpah north of Jerusalem (see Judg 20,3).
▪ Intervention of the deity in 11,29a, 32b also belongs to this layer.
▪ The summary and reference to the death of Jephthah in 12,7
is typically Deuteronomistic. Note that the author no longer under-
stands that Gilead is a town. The term d[lg yr[ also appears
in Josh 13,25.
The volume of post-Deuteronomistic materials in the Jephthah
story is significant. They include 25:
• expansion of the Deuteronomistic opening in 10,1-16. I refer to
24
SOGGIN, Judges, 205-206.
25
Becker (Richterzeit und Königtum), identified four expansions of the old
tradition: the dialogue between YhWh and Israel in 10,10b-16, the Bible-based
arguments in 11,12-28, Jephthah’s vow in 11,30-31.34-40 and the fight with
ephraim in 12,1-6.