Luca Marulli, «A Letter of Recommendation? A Closer look at Third John’s “rhetorical” Argumentation», Vol. 90 (2009) 203-223
Previous studies argue that the Elder composed the letter to recommend Demetrius to Gaius, and that Third John therefore falls into the “letter of recommendation” genre. After assessing the differences between common letters of recommendation and Third John, this study examines the rhetoric of Third John in an attempt to show that it is not a letter of recommendation, but rather an epideictic rhetorical attempt to restore the Elder’s honor (discredited by Diotrephes) in Gaius’ eyes and persuade him to detach himself from Diotrephes’ reprehensible behavior by extending hospitality to the Elder’s envoys.
A Letter of Recommendation? 209
assume that he was well versed in the study of principles and rules of
composition.
4. The “rhetorical†arrangement of Third John
a) Opening Formula (v. 1)
Despite Funk’s acclaimed remarks on the Hellenistic character of
the letter (22), Third John’s opening formula is more akin to Aramaic
letters. Like Third John, such letters often lack a word of greeting (23)
(instead, he mentions the “truthâ€, which alerts the reader to the tone
and one of the main themes of the letter (24)). Moreover, while the
addressee is identified by his name, the sender introduces himself as
simply “the Elderâ€, without specifying his name. This is also atypical
of common Greek letters (25). On the other hand, the author employs a
health wish (though not in the opening formula, but just after, in v. 2),
which is common in Hellenistic papyri (e.g., P. Paris 43 [154 BC] (26)).
Third John also distances itself from the common pattern of NT letters,
which usually combine in their opening words such as peace, grace,
and/or mercy (cf. 1 Cor 1,3; Eph 1,2; Phil 1,2; 1 Tim 1,2; 2 Tim 1,2;
Titus 1,4; 2 John 3).
The above remarks show that the Elder freely composed his letter
without necessarily fitting a specific mold, but drawing from his
Jewish and Graeco-Roman background.
b) Thanksgiving and commendation (vv. 2-4)
In the opening formula, Gaius finds himself as the recipient of the
Elder ’s health wish. While a number of papyri have a health wish at
the onset of the letter (e.g., P. Yale 42 [229 BCE]; P. Mert I,12 [58 CE];
(22) FUNK, “Form and Structureâ€, 424-425.
(23) EDWARDS, The Johannine Epistles, 23. A word of greeting is usually
missing in Greek letters dealing with business or philosophical matters, which is
not the case for our letter (cf. H.-J. KLAUCK, Ancient Letters and the New
Testament. A Guide to Context and Exegesis [Waco, TX 2006] 27-28). Thus 3
John’s opening is very atypical.
(24) The next short section (v. 2-4) repeats the word ajlhvqeia three times.
(25) BROWN, John, 789. KLAUCK, Ancient Letters, 27. An example of the
common threefold opening formula (superscriptio, adscriptio, salutatio) is P.
Oslo II,47 (August 23, 1 CE): “Dionysios to his dearest Theon, very many
greetings and for ever good healthâ€.
(26) “Serapion, to his brothers Ptolemaeus and Apollonius, greetings. If you
are well, it would be excellent; I myself am wellâ€; cf. also the previously
mentioned P. Oslo II,47.