Gesila Nneka Uzukwu, «Gal 3,28 and its Alleged Relationship to Rabbinic Writings», Vol. 91 (2010) 370-392
Scholars have suggested that Gal 3,28 is comparable to similar sayings found in rabbinic writings, and that the latter can help in interpreting and understanding the meaning and theology of Gal 3,28. In this study we have analysed and compared the alleged similar sayings found in Jewish texts and Gal 3,28 in order to demonstrate that Gal 3,28 is neither literally nor thematically related to the former, and we should not allow the alleged similar sayings found in rabbinic writings to influence our reading of Gal 3,28. Both texts reflect the conceptual uses of pairs of opposites in the Greco-Roman tradition, but at the same time, their subsequent usages or occurrences in Jewish and Christian texts came into being independently from one another.
376 GESILA NNEKA UZUKWU
Barbarian 9. According to Meeks, the social reality behind the three
blessings and expressions of gratitude found in both Greek and
rabbinic writings is that of opposition and negative attitude toward
one of the members of those paired realities. However, as Meeks
argues, in antiquity this social reality had begun to decline in the
Hellenistic, world while it continued to exist within Judaism 10.
Examining some Jewish writings from antiquity, especially the
works of Philo, Josephus and Eliezer ben Hyrcanus, Meeks opines
that the Judaism in the Hellenistic era had a very negative view of
women. In the Talmud, he argues, the view of women was not
completely negative, there was the presence of few women in the
rabbinic academies, but their involvement is not comparable to the
involvement of women in the Stoic community 11.
Just as in our study of the problem of the alleged relationship
between Gal 3,28 and the three expressions of gratitude found in
Greek writings, we noted that the assumption of a possible influ-
e n c e of the latter on the former is highly questionable 12 ,
so also in our study of the alleged relationship between three bless-
ings of gratitude found in rabbinic writings and Gal 3,28, we are
faced with similar problems. First, there are striking differences
MEEKS, “The Image of the Androgyneâ€, 167-168, n. 8. See also
9
D. KAUFMANN, “Das Alter der drei Benedictionen von Israel, vom Freien, und
vom Mannâ€, MGWJ 37 (1893) 14-18; KAHN, “Gentiles, Slaves and Womenâ€,
18-19. Here, we will be bringing in the result of our study of Gal 3,28 and the
alleged relationship with the three expressions of gratitude found in Greek
writings into our current discussion. To get a full grasp of the debate, however,
see our article on Gal 3,28 and its alleged relationship to the three expressions
of gratitude found in Greek writings.
MEEKS, “The Image of the Androgyneâ€, 167-168, 174-179.
10
The reference to women in the three blessings of gratitude found in
11
rabbinic writings has given scholars an edge to reduce the three blessings of
gratitude found in Jewish writings to debate on gender. The discussion has
become more an issue on Jewish women in antiquity and less on the view of
women, slaves and ignorant persons as referred to in the texts. We have already
seen the evidence in the work of Meeks. There can be some justifications for
this narrow approach to the three blessings of gratitude found in rabbinic
writings. Nevertheless, our major objection is that when scholars narrowly
focus on this text, they tend to read too much into the text, and overlook several
other issues that need to be investigated.
See our article on Gal 3,28 and its alleged relationship to the three
12
expressions of gratitude found in Greek writings.