Gesila Nneka Uzukwu, «Gal 3,28 and its Alleged Relationship to Rabbinic Writings», Vol. 91 (2010) 370-392
Scholars have suggested that Gal 3,28 is comparable to similar sayings found in rabbinic writings, and that the latter can help in interpreting and understanding the meaning and theology of Gal 3,28. In this study we have analysed and compared the alleged similar sayings found in Jewish texts and Gal 3,28 in order to demonstrate that Gal 3,28 is neither literally nor thematically related to the former, and we should not allow the alleged similar sayings found in rabbinic writings to influence our reading of Gal 3,28. Both texts reflect the conceptual uses of pairs of opposites in the Greco-Roman tradition, but at the same time, their subsequent usages or occurrences in Jewish and Christian texts came into being independently from one another.
382 GESILA NNEKA UZUKWU
With regard to purity issues, the domestic, social, and religious
relationships between a Jew and a Gentile, a Jewish male and a
Jewish female, and between a Jewish free born and a Jewish slave
(ignorant person), are very much in check. From the point of view
of holiness, a Jewish man stands higher above a Gentile, a Jewish
woman and a Jewish slave. In the context of fulfilling the Law, a
Jewish male considers himself sacred; he is set apart and should
not be defiled by the “other, the polluted, the unholy†21. If the
other is indeed a “radically separable and separate entity†22 as
questioned by Jonathan Boyarin and if “separation in fact cannot
ultimately tolerate difference†23 as suggested by Keller, then a
Jewish male is bound to keep his distance from those who are
considered the “other†in order to keep his soul divine and pure.
Our third and final observation concerns the question of how
rabbinic Judaism reflects Jewish traditions and heritage after the
second Temple period, and how such traditions and heritage are
further defined and expressed in statements like the three blessings
of gratitude found in rabbinic sources. As already hinted above, the
use of rabbinic tradition for understanding second Temple Judaism
or rabbinic Judaism is certainly not easy. Given the problem of Sitz
im Leben and Sitz im Literatur of rabbinic materials, we cannot
adequately decide the extent to which the three blessings of
gratitude found in rabbinic texts relate to the system of thought,
religious and social practices of Judaism of the Second Temple
period or of rabbinic Judaism. In addition, there is the problem of
identifying the origin of the three blessings of gratitude found in
rabbinic sources. Although scholars attempted to read the three
blessings against the background of the three expressions of
gratitude attributed to Socrates and Plato respectively, we have
sacredness of places, persons or things consecrated and set apart as sacred by
God’s presence or contact with sacred places. It also includes the holiness of
God, of his divine activity, of his name as sacred, inviolable and separate from
all defilement. BDB also mentions that the original idea behind this word çdq is
that of separation or withdrawal.
C . KELLER, “Roundtable Discussion: Feminist Reflections on
21
Separation and Unity in Jewish Theologyâ€, JFSR 1 (1985) 118-121, 120.
J. BOYARIN, “The Other within and the Other Withoutâ€, The Other in
22
Jewish Thought and History. Constructions of Jewish Culture and Identity
(eds. L.J. SILBERSTEIN – R.L. COHN) (New York 1995) 424-452, 424.
KELLER, “Roundtableâ€,120.
23