Bernardo Estrada, «The Last Beatitude. Joy in Suffering.», Vol. 91 (2010) 187-209
The motive of joy in suffering for Jesus' sake, makes the last beatitude in Matt 5,11-12 and Luke 6,22-23 different from the former blessings. The persecution form present in this beatitude seems to be an authentic saying of Jesus, subsequently widespread in NT literature. Such a motive, in fact, does not appear in Judaism and in intertestamental or in apocryphal literature. The First Letter of Peter is instead a special witness of 'joy in suffering'.
188 BERNARDO ESTRADA
characteristic features of a real blessing 6. Meynet, underlining the
concept of heaven at the beginning and at the end of Matt 5,3-16,
actually sees here a single literary unit in which the ninth beatitude
has the hinge-function for the whole section 7. This ninth blessing
has a special literary form, much longer than that of the others. It is
in fact more direct and not addressed in the general and impersonal
fashion of the third person used in other Matthean beatitudes. The
other makarisms look at a present condition while the last one talks
about suffering and persecution as a pledge of an abundant future
reward.
In the first four beatitudes the condition of misery and distress
reflects a passive attitude that attracts God’s gaze and solicitude.
They are carriers of the kerygma to distressed people, the
announcement of the kingdom’s salvation to those who wait for it 8.
The second quartet contains the demands of the kingdom itself in
Messianic times, the qualities required in order to be called
makarioi 9. The ninth blessing is pronounced in a future setting and
Â¥
contains a promise: suffering for Jesus’ sake will merit a special
reward in the kingdom. Thus, announcement-demand-promise
would be the trilogy that describes the climactic proclamation of the
beatitudes in Matthew 10.
Luke’s four beatitudes (6,20b-23) are formulated in the second
person and derive from a common source with Matthew’s, probably
from Q 11, but both evangelists show a great degree of freedom in
presenting the basic underlying tradition 12. The woes that follow the
says that Matthew would have composed the eighth beatitude based on the
ninth one: The Good News According to Matthew (Atlanta, GA 1975) 84.
Cf. J. DUPONT, Les béatitudes (Bruges 1958-1973) I, 228; III, 308-310.
6
Cf. MEYNET, “I frutti dell’analisi retoricaâ€, 409. Also Dupont took this
7
position some years ago (cf. his Béatitudes, III, 316. Cf. I, 209-229).
Cf. J. SCHNIEWIND, Das Evangelium nach Matthäus (Göttingen 131984) 40.
8
Cf. SCHNIEWIND, Das Evangelium nach Matthäus, 45-46.
9
The second person would help to create such a climax in the whole set of
10
beatitudes. Cf. DAVIES – ALLISON, Matthew I, 461.
For a reconstruction of Q and its parallels in the beatitudes, cf.
11
J. LAMBRECHT, The Sermon on the Mount. Proclamation and Exhortation
(Wilmington, DE 1985) 48-52.
Cf. H. FRANKEMÖLLE, “Die Makarismen (Matt 5,1-12: Luke 6,20-23).
12
Motive und Umfang der redaktionelle Kompositionâ€, BZ 15 (1971) 52-75.