Bernardo Estrada, «The Last Beatitude. Joy in Suffering.», Vol. 91 (2010) 187-209
The motive of joy in suffering for Jesus' sake, makes the last beatitude in Matt 5,11-12 and Luke 6,22-23 different from the former blessings. The persecution form present in this beatitude seems to be an authentic saying of Jesus, subsequently widespread in NT literature. Such a motive, in fact, does not appear in Judaism and in intertestamental or in apocryphal literature. The First Letter of Peter is instead a special witness of 'joy in suffering'.
192 BERNARDO ESTRADA
rising up from the ground and dancing 30. It appears only seven times
in LXX and three in the NT, all in Luke’s gospel. The heaven, in the
singular, denotes a Hellenistic concept that contrasts with the rather
Semitic “heavens†31.
The suffering just described has a special mark, a motivation: it
must be undergone for Jesus’ sake, eneken emoy (Matt 5,11); Luke
™ ߘ
6,22 says instead eneka toy yıoy toy anurwpoy. If the previous
™ ˜ Ω˜ ˜ß ¥
beatitudes carry an implicit Christology (Jesus’ mission as the
beginning of the kingdom among humankind), the last one is more
explicit and contemplates tribulation in a later period on account of
Christ. Such an explicit assertion is difficult to apply to Jesus’ time,
but not to the time of the Church 32. Could it be possible that the first
Christians adopted this way of speaking, putting Jesus in the place
of Israel’s God? According to Mark, Jesus promises reward to
“ whosoever shall lose his life for my sake and the gospel’s ...†33. To
give up all things 34, to stand before kings and governors 35, to be
hated on account or “for the sake of my nameâ€, are expressions that
reflect the catechetical concern of early Christian language.
The community sees the last beatitude as a model of suffering to
imitate, not in a generic way but for Jesus’ sake 36. It is not
impossible that Jesus would have foreseen tribulation and verbal
abuse 37 both for himself and for his disciples 38. The persecution of
Christ’s disciples, like the prophets of the OT 39, probably reflects
the growing tension between the community for whom the gospel
Cf. SCHÃœRMANN, Lukasevangelium, 334, n. 65.
30
The expression is linked to the misuov, reward, that extends its joy to the
Â¥
31
present time. Cf. M. CORBIN, “Votre récompense est grande dans les cieuxâ€,
Christus 28 (1981) 65-77.
Cf. Acts 5,41; Cf. Acts 9,16; 15,26; 21,13; 2 Cor 4,11; 12,10; Phil 1,29;
32
Rev 1,9; 2,3; 6,9; 20,4. Jer 15,15
Mark 8,35; par. Matt 16,25; Luke 9,24.
33
Mark 10,29 par.
34
Cf. Mark 13,9-10 par.
35
Cf. A. SATAKE, “Das Leiden der Jünger ‘um meinetwillen’â€, ZNW 67
36
(1976) 4-19.
It is considered a sin as grave as idolatry, fornication and bloodshed put
37
together. Cf. Kommentar zum Neuen Testament aus Talmud und Midrasch (eds.
H. STRACK – P. BILLERBECK) (München 1926-8) I, 227.
Cf. HOWARD MARSHALL, Luke, 252.
38
The first merit is that of suffering unjustly, the second of suffering for
39
Jesus’ sake. The suffering of Amos and Jeremiah could be two exemplary cases