Karl Olav Sandnes, «Whence and Whither. A Narrative Perspective on Birth a!nwqen
(John 3,3-8)», Vol. 86 (2005) 153-173
In John 3 birth a!nwqen is
illustrated by the wind. Its effect can be experienced without knowledge of from
whence it comes and whither it goes. This analogy asserts both the reality and
the mysterious nature of the wind. John 3,8 is, however, not exhausted by this
analogy. John 3,3-8 belongs within an epistemological pattern found throughout
this Gospel: like is known by like. The mysterious and enigmatic nature of
Jesus’ identity sheds light on the "whence and whither" of John 3,8. Christology
thus becomes a key to understand the mysterious nature of faith.
158 Karl Olav Sandnes
suggests that John 3 “contains a scrutiny of religious epistemology and
Christology†(13). To Neyrey, John 3 presents Jesus as the revealer of
heavenly secrets. The importance of this observation is unquestionable,
but vv. 3-8 address a related issue, namely the prerequisite for receiving
such revelation. The Christological language of whence and whither is
here applied directly (ou{twj ejstivn) to the believer. The exegesis of the
dialogue must account for the way Christological terminology occurs in
the illustration of a person born a[nwqen (v. 8).
2. Like is known by like
We have seen that John 3,3-8 is embedded in an epistemological
context in which likeness is foundational. This principle is by no
means attested only in John’s Gospel; on the contrary it is found also
elsewhere at key points in the New Testament (14). John 3,3-8 has
adopted an epistemological conviction of wide currency in Antiquity.
It suffices to give some examples to demonstrate this. Sextus
Empiricus (2.-3. century A.D.) may serve as a point of departure. In
his work Against the Professors, he mentions the principle “like is
known by like†(toi'" oJmoivoi" ta; o{moia ginwvskesqai) as fundamental
to all knowledge. He calls this principle an old dovgma handed down
from Pythagoras, which is found in Plato (15) but stated much earlier by
Empedocles (fl. 477-432 B.C.). Sextus quotes Empedocles, who says
that earth is “seen†by earth, water by water, air by air, fire by fire, love
by love, and hate by hate (16). This principle explains, according to
(13) NEYREY, “John III – A Debate over Johannine Epistemology and
Christologyâ€, 115. See NICHOLSON, Death as Departure, 104 who says that John
3,1-10 “revolves around the question of who Jesus is and what must happen
before a person can adequately understand himâ€.
(14) L.A. JARVIS, “Becoming like God through Christ: Discipleship in
Romansâ€, Patterns of Discipleship in the New Testament (ed. R.N. LONGE-
NECKER) (Grand Rapids, MI – Cambridge U.K. 1996) 143-162.
(15) Sextus probably had in mind Timaeus 45B-D, where Plato says that
“seeing†takes place through the principle of o[moion pro;" o[moion, and Protagoras
337C-338A where he speaks metaphorically of the “sanctuary of wisdom†(to;
prutaneion th'" sofiva") in which the wise men among the Greeks live since they
'
know the nature of things which is to; o[moion tw/' oJmoivw/ fuvsei suggenev" ejstin.
(16) This fragment was quite popular in Antiquity; see e.g. Aristotle,
Metaphysics 1000b21; Hippolytus, Refutatio 6.11-12 (138.3-9). These references
are taken from B. INWOOD, The Poem of Empedocles. A Text and Translation with
an Introduction (Toronto – Buffalo – London 1992). He mentions an apophtegm
attributed to Empedocles: “To the man who said, ‘I cannot find a wise man’,