Karl Olav Sandnes, «Whence and Whither. A Narrative Perspective on Birth a!nwqen
(John 3,3-8)», Vol. 86 (2005) 153-173
In John 3 birth a!nwqen is
illustrated by the wind. Its effect can be experienced without knowledge of from
whence it comes and whither it goes. This analogy asserts both the reality and
the mysterious nature of the wind. John 3,8 is, however, not exhausted by this
analogy. John 3,3-8 belongs within an epistemological pattern found throughout
this Gospel: like is known by like. The mysterious and enigmatic nature of
Jesus’ identity sheds light on the "whence and whither" of John 3,8. Christology
thus becomes a key to understand the mysterious nature of faith.
Whence and Whither A Narrative Perspective on Birth a[nwqen 159
Sextus, why Empedocles called himself a god; he kept his mind free
from evil, and by the god within him (oJ ejn eJautw'/ qeov") he understood
the god outside himself (17) (Against the Professors 1.303 cf. Against
the Logicians 1.121). In his Against the Logicians 1.92-93, Sextus
repeats the quotation without attributing it to Empedocles. Instead he
refers to Philolaus, who said that things are understood when a certain
suggevneia is possessed, since things are comprehended by their like
(upo; tou' oJmoivou to; o{moion katalambavnesqai pevfuken). Sextus cites
J
Poseidonius as saying very much the same thing in his interpretation of
Plato’s Timaeus: light is known by light, and sound by hearing since
“The nature of all things ought to be apprehended by its kindred
reason†(…uJpo; suggenou'" ... katalambavnesqai tou' lovgou). In these
texts Sextus gives a “map†of the principle “like is known by likeâ€. He
mentions some important sources, he states both the antiquity and the
importance of this epistemological principle. The principle of likeness
forms a substratum to Plotinus’s logic in his Enneads:
To any vision must be brought an eye adapted to what is to be seen,
and having some likeness to it (to; ga;r oJrw'n pro;" to; oJrwvmenon
suggene" kai; o{moion poihsavmenon dei' ejpibavllein) (18). Never did eye
;
see the sun unless it had first become sunlike, and never can the soul
have vision of the First Beauty unless itself be beautiful. Therefore,
first let each become godlike and each beautiful who cares to see God
and Beauty (Enneads I.6.9)
Antiquity shared a theory that human beings had a light within,
streaming forth through the eyes and meeting the light of day. The
eye was likened to a light within or a lamp that made perception
possible (19). This theory of vision developed a principle of perception,
an epistemological conviction that like is known by like.
——————
Empedocles said, `that is because he who looks for a wise man must first be wise
himself` (159)â€. Diogenes Laertius 9.20 attributes this saying to Xenophanes.
(17) Greek philosophy shared the thought of the intellect as divine; gods and
humans share a rational nature; see JARVIS, “Becoming like God through Christ:
Discipleship in Romansâ€, 145-147.
(18) The translation is taken from S. MACKENNA, Plotinus. The Ethical Treatises
(The Library of Philosophical Translations 1; London 1917). Greek text, see P.
HENRY – H.-R. SCHWYZER, Plotini Opera, Tomus I, Enneades I-III (Oxford 1964).
(19) H.D. BETZ, “Matthew VI.22f and ancient Greek theories of visionâ€, Text
and Interpretation. Studies in the New Testament presented to Matthew Black
(eds. E. BEST – R.McL. WILSON) (Cambridge 1979) 43-56; D.C. ALLISON, Jr.,
“The Eye is the Lamp of the Body (Matthew 6.22-23=Luke 11.34-36)â€, NTS 33
(1987) 61-83.