Luca Marulli, «A Letter of Recommendation? A Closer look at Third John’s “rhetorical” Argumentation», Vol. 90 (2009) 203-223
Previous studies argue that the Elder composed the letter to recommend Demetrius to Gaius, and that Third John therefore falls into the “letter of recommendation” genre. After assessing the differences between common letters of recommendation and Third John, this study examines the rhetoric of Third John in an attempt to show that it is not a letter of recommendation, but rather an epideictic rhetorical attempt to restore the Elder’s honor (discredited by Diotrephes) in Gaius’ eyes and persuade him to detach himself from Diotrephes’ reprehensible behavior by extending hospitality to the Elder’s envoys.
206 Luca Marulli
commending, accompanied by a request to receive or welcome (cf.
Phlm 12,17; Rom 16,1-2; Phil 2,25.29). This feature is absent in Third
John with regards to Demetrius.
2. Demetrius, bearer of the letter?
The more general epistolary conventions of the Graeco-Roman
world (especially between 200 BCE and 200 CE) show (12) that the letter
carrier, when expressly named, played a more significant role than
simply physically delivering the letter: he was entrusted to supply
information (e.g., P. Oxy 292 [c. 25 CE]), deliver goods (e.g., P. Oxy
II,113; P. Oxy II,3313; P. Oxy 300 [late I CE]; P. Oxy 529 [II CE]), and
in some cases act as the representative of the sender (e.g., P. Oxy 743
[2 BCE]; P. Oxy 293 [27 CE]; P. Coll. III,6). But in all these scenarios,
the letter carrier is named in the letter and the recipient is carefully
instructed regarding the role of the letter bearer. In contrast, as Lieu
has already noted (13), 3 John 12 introduces Demetrius with the passive
voice of marturevw (perfect passive: memartuvrhtai uJpo; pavntwn, “[he]
has received a good testimony from everyoneâ€). The passive voice of
marturevw is used in the New Testament to introduce an example
worthy of honor and imitation, and not a letter bearer or an envoy in
need of hospitality: Acts 6,3 (the “sevenâ€, marturoumevnou"); 10,22
(Cornelius, marturouvmenov"); 22,12 (Ananias, marturouvmeno"); 1 Tim
5,10 (the “good widowâ€, marturoumevnh) (14).
In Third John, Demetrius is explicitly named, praised by
“everyoneâ€, “the truth itselfâ€, and the Elder and his entourage (“weâ€),
and yet not explicitly mentioned as being sent by the Elder. Demetrius
is not portrayed as needing hospitality, carrying out a specific function,
or acting as a representative of the Elder. In light of these
considerations, we suggest that he could very well have been a person
known by Gaius for being a noble and exemplary Christian, and not
necessarily the bearer of the letter. Moreover, the following section
shows that if we seriously consider Demetrius’ role in the rhetorical
(12) P.M. HEAD, “Letter Carriers in Personal Letters among the Papyri and
Pauline Epistolary Communication Strategy†(Paper presented at the annual
meeting of the British New Testament Society, Social World Seminar 1-3 Sept.
2005) 1-13. Available online in PDF format at www.gmir.ru/old/ecclesia/pdf/
june/Head.pdf
(13) J. LIEU, The Second and Third Epistles of John. History and Background
(Studies of the New Testament and Its World; Edinburgh 1986) 118.
(14) Cf. also Heb 11,2; 1 Clem 18,1.44,3.