Luca Marulli, «A Letter of Recommendation? A Closer look at Third John’s “rhetorical” Argumentation», Vol. 90 (2009) 203-223
Previous studies argue that the Elder composed the letter to recommend Demetrius to Gaius, and that Third John therefore falls into the “letter of recommendation” genre. After assessing the differences between common letters of recommendation and Third John, this study examines the rhetoric of Third John in an attempt to show that it is not a letter of recommendation, but rather an epideictic rhetorical attempt to restore the Elder’s honor (discredited by Diotrephes) in Gaius’ eyes and persuade him to detach himself from Diotrephes’ reprehensible behavior by extending hospitality to the Elder’s envoys.
A Letter of Recommendation? 207
composition of the letter, it makes more sense to consider Demetrius as
a praiseworthy character previously known by Gaius, rather than a
stranger letter-carrier.
3. Third John’s use of Rhetoric
Today’s scholars estimate that in ancient Roman Palestine, only
about 10 percent of the population was able to read and write (15). The
number of people who had access to formal rhetorical training was
dramatically less. However, as DeSilva puts it, the New Testament
authors very likely had the chance to enjoy the “informal training of
hearing orators at work, of learning inductively the art of persua-
sionâ€(16). Moreover, if we observe for instance the way letters were
written — the various styles and different formats of literary letters,
the less refined correspondence found on papyri, and the ostraca — we
notice some widespread patterns. In one way or another, these patterns
were influenced by Cicero’s letters, mostly published after his death in
43 BCE (17). Though a number of commentaries on letter writing were
written during late antiquity, it is hard to know if they had an actual
impact on the way letters were written. The consensus today seems to
be that these commentaries were rather acknowledging and
rationalizing the different patterns and styles already in use, since
ancient letter books of styles and the actual letters share the same basic
three-fold understanding of the functions and purposes of correspon-
dence: Philophronesis (the friendly relationship between two persons);
Parousia (reviving the friendly relationship of physically separated
correspondents; Omilia/dialogos (main function of the letter: dialogic
conversation) (18).
It has already been shown that letters were used to carry religious
and philosophical teachings since the first century CE (19). Further, it is
very likely that New Testament authors were exposed to the art of
(15) W.V. HARRIS, Ancient Literacy (Cambridge 1989) 1-24; C. HEZSER,
Jewish Literacy in Roman Palestine (Text und Studien zum antiken Judentum;
Tübingen 2001) 496.
(16) D.A. DESILVA, Honor, Patronage, Kinship & Purity. Unlocking New
Testament Culture (Downers Grove, IL 2000) 42, n. 19.
(17) W.G. DOTY, Letters in Primitive Christianity (Guides to Biblical
Scholarship; Philadelphia, PA 1973) 2-3.
(18) See for instance Demetrius’ Peri hermeneias. DOTY, Letters, 8-9; 11-12.
(19) Cf. the letters of Apollonius of Tyana (born 4 BCE), cited by DOTY,
Letters, 3.