Kevin McGeough, «Birth Bricks, Potter’s Wheels, and Exodus 1,16», Vol. 87 (2006) 305-318
It is argued here that the Hebrew word ’obnayim, which appears in Exodus 1,16
and Jeremiah 18,3 refers to either birthing equipment or equipment used in
ceramic production. The particular type of birthing equipment referred to by this
word is identified as a “birth brick”, which is well attested in Near Eastern
literature and one of which has been uncovered in archaeological excavations at
Abydos in Egypt. It is further argued that the semantic range of this word is not
surprising given the conceptual link between child birth and ceramic manufacture
in the ancient Near East.
306 Kevin McGeough
footnote to explain the translation, saying: “More exactly, the brick or
stone supports used by Egyptian women during child birthâ€. The NIV
translates the term in virtually the same way: delivery stool. The Evan-
Shoshan concordance defines the word as: maππab ’iππah belidtah (a
woman’s place to sit while she gives birthâ€. The American Standard
Bible, the Webster Bible, and even the King James Bible all offer
translations that suggest that the ’obnayim was a type of equipment sat
upon by a woman while in labor. However, there are enough divergent
interpretations to make this discussion important. Surprisingly, a
consensus has not yet been reached about what exactly this word refers
to or how it should be understood.
As a brief digression, it is important to note that these translations
presuppose that women in ancient Egypt did not give birth while in a
supine position. Birthing while lying down is a relatively modern
innovation, and in many ways is more beneficial for the attending
doctor or midwife than for the pregnant woman herself. A squatting or
seated position better facilitates a mother’s own power to birth, in that
it allows the pelvic floor muscles to stretch more easily and allows the
woman to use her thigh muscles along with her abdominal muscles
and uterus in a way that does not fight gravity. A birthing stool was
frequently employed in this process, since it helped support the mother
during labor. There is much ethnographic evidence for birthing
techniques in this position, using a birthing stool, from the Roman
period through sixteenth century Puritan practices to the Fellahin of
modern Egypt. The Roman author Soranus (who wrote during the
reigns of Trajan and Hadrian) describes such a stool as a seat with a
crescent-shaped cavity — allowing the woman to sit, but not
interfering with the birthing process. Similar images are presented in
Thomas Raynalde’s 1545 work, The Byrthe of Mankynde; two
woodcuts visually illustrate how a birthing stool was used in Germany.
In front of the expectant mother is the midwife, seated slightly lower
so that she has access to the mother and baby. In both woodcuts, a
woman stands behind the mother as well giving further support.
Textual descriptions of such activities are also attested in Medieval
manuals and in Puritan documents (2). Photographs in Winifred
(2) For discussion on the Medieval manuals, see J. TOWLER – J. BRAMELL,
Midwives in History and Society (New Hampshire 1986) 82 and, more generally, B.
ROWLAND, Medieval Woman’s Guide to Health (Kent 1981). For discussion on the
Puritan documents, see R.V. SCHNUCKER, “The English Puritans and Pregnancy,
Delivery and Breast Feedingâ€, History of Childhood Quarterly 1 (1974) 641.