Csaba Balogh, «'He Filled Zion with Justice and Righteousness'. The Composition of Isaiah 33», Vol. 89 (2008) 477-504
In contrast to most opinions concerning Isa 33 this pericope is far too complex to be explained as one coherent literary unit. Isa 33 has a short anti-Assyrian woe-cry at its bases (vv. 1+4), which once closed the woe-cries of Isa 28–32. Vv. 1+4 were supplemented first (around 598 or 587) by a communal lament, vv. 2-3+5+7-12, bringing the idea of the punishment of Judah and the temporised destruction of the enemy in vv. 1+4 further. Second, (shortly after 539) vv. 1-5.7-12 were expanded by a salvation prophecy, vv. 6+13-24, concerning the returnees, the restoration of Jerusalem and the monarchy.
“He Filled Zion with Justice and Righteousness†487
in Ps 12,1-6 and Isa 37 (44). The role of v. 6 will be understood only
later.
Isa 33,13 is a YHWH-speech that some see as one unit with 33,10-
12 (45). Other exegetes question that this formal similarity is sufficient
to support literary unity (46). Indeed, the imperative w[mv often signifies
the beginning of a new prophecy (cf. Isa 1,2.10; 6,9; 7,13; 36,13; 48,1;
49,1; etc.). Furthermore, the 2nd pers. forms in v. 13 do not refer to the
enemy as in vv. 1, 4, or 11, but they have a different audience in view.
Regarding the connection between vv. 13-24 and 1-12, one may
note that vv. 13-24 make often use of motifs attested in vv. 1-12,
suggesting that the two are supposed to be related. At the same time,
however, there is a clear shift in the theme of the prophecy from the
promise of destroying the enemy, to the description of those going to
dwell in the city in the future. At the point of v. 13, the enemy seems to
have already been destroyed (cf. ytyc[). Moreover, while motifs and
themes from vv. 1-12 reappear later, these motifs are reused in a
modified sense, as reinterpretations, underlining their different origin.
(a) hlkwa va in v. 14 points back to v. 12. But while fire is there an
instrument of judgment, in v. 14 the fire is located in Zion and is
identified with YHWH. (b) μymwrm and bgcm in v. 16 clearly allude to v.
5, but while there the exaltation of YHWH emphasises his withdrawal
and estrangement from Zion (cf. Isa 6,1; 18,4), in v. 16 YHWH and his
people dwell in the same place. In v. 5 μwrm is clearly not Jerusalem (Ps
148,1), but it probably is in v. 16. (c) In v. 15 the twqdx Ëšlh may allude
to hqdx in v. 5, but in v. 5 it is a divine act. (d) In v. 8 the sinful ancestors
rejected the treaty (μyd[ sam), in v. 15 the righteous one will reject (sam)
a form of life contrary to the covenant. (e) In v. 4 the identity of the
plunderers of the enemy is unclear, in v. 23 these plunderers appear to
be Jews.
Some take μyqwjr and μybwrq to refer to non-Jews and Jews alike,
i.e. all people of the world (47). Others consider μybwrq Jerusalemites and
(44) The description of the situation and the prayer are interchanged in Isa 37.
Cf. also Ps 60; 85; Jer 14,1-10. The relationship between the prayer in 33,2-3 and
the oracle 33,10-12 may also be underlined by μwr in v. 10 and tmmwr in v. 3 (cf.,
however, 1QIsaa).
(45) KAISER, Jesaja, 274; WILDBERGER, Jesaja, 1302; KOENEN, Heil, 119;
SWEENEY, Isaiah, 424.
(46) VERMEYLEN, Isaïe, I, 432; ROBERTS, “Isaiah 33â€, 15; WASCHKE, “Jesaja
33â€, 520.
(47) KAISER, Jesaja, 274; KUSTÃR, Krankheit, 84.