Toan Do, «Does peri olou tou kosmou imply 'the sins of the whole world' in 1 John 2,2?», Vol. 94 (2013) 415-435
In 1 John 2,2 the phrases (2b) peri ton amartion emon, (2c) ou peri ton emeteron de monon, (2d) alla kai peri olou tou kosmou, demand careful interpretation. The construction ou monon alla kai, explains the sequence of 2b and 2c, following the peri-clause in 2a. However, this does not explain theologically to what peri olou tou kosmou in 2d refers. This essay seeks, in some measure, to remedy this syntactical conundrum by proposing a contextual reading of 2a as parallel with 2d.
05_Biblica_Do_Layout 1 08/07/13 12:57 Pagina 420
420 TOAN DO
]]
]
2,1d ecomen pro.j to.n pate,ra VIhsou/n Cristo.n di,kaion
;
2,2a autoj
v. ilasmoj
` , estin
v
2,2b peri. tw/n a`martiw/n h`mw/n,
ouv
2,2c peri. tw/n h`mete,rwn
de. mo,non
alla. kai.
v
2,2d peri. olou tou/ ko,smou
[
The emphasis of the first question (a) lies in the Johannine con-
cept of sin (tw/n a`martiw/n h`mw/n) in 2b; the impetus of the second
question (b) is placed on the salvific work of Jesus as i`lasmo,j in
bearing 2a with regard to the use of peri. o[lou tou/ ko,smou in 2d 23.
II. Contemporary interpretations of peri. o[lou tou/ ko,smou
The syntactic position of peri. o[lou tou/ ko,smou has been com-
monly held as grammatically following the peri,-clause in 2b. Often
“the sins†is construed as belonging to or having to do with the
“whole†world. Apart from Westcott and Plummer, no scholars have
questioned the exact connotation implied in the object of the peri,-
clause in 2d 24. Perhaps influenced by their reading of the three peri,-
clauses in 2,2bcd, scholars interpret peri. o[lou tou/ ko,smou as a
sequence of peri. tw/n a`martiw/n h`mw/n 25. Of particular importance in
For discussion on the background and extra-biblical usages of ko,smoj,
23
see H. SASSE, “kosme,w, ko,smoj, ko,smioj, kosmiko,jâ€, ThWNT 3 (Stuttgart 1938)
867-898, esp. 868-882. Also C. SPICQ, Theological Lexicon of the New Tes-
tament (Peabody, MA 32008) s.v. kosme,w, 330-335.
BROWN, Epistles of John, 222, is the only scholar after Westcott and
24
Plummer who points out some irregularity in the peri,-clause of 2d. In his
overall interpretation of 1 John 2,1-2, however, Brown shares a common be-
lief in seeing peri. o[lou tou/ ko,smou as “the sins†of the world.
U.C. VON WAHLDE, The Gospel and Letters of John. Commentary on
25
the Three Johannine Letters (ECC 3; Grand Rapids, MI 2010) 45, inserts
word(s) that are not in John’s text, saying: “the author exhorts his readers not
to sin, but if they do Jesus is a Paraclete and an atonement for their sin and
that of the entire worldâ€. The list of scholars of similar view is long. Here are
cited only a few. W. VOGLER, Die Briefe des Johannes (THNT 17; Leipzig
1993) 68-69; and PAINTER, 1, 2, and 3 John, 158-159.
© Gregorian Biblical Press 2013 - Tutti i diritti riservati